返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-3 04:11 編輯
皮蛋仔,睇問題成熟小小得得? 個世界如果係咁簡單,就唔會有咁多變化。
睇你平時都有留意下新聞,點睇歐債 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 02:21


Hong Kong's economy is just a very small pond for the big Chinese companies.
In our hypothetical scenario, the Chinese have so many levers that they can pull, just to squeeze out Hong Kong easily.
HK people should realize that they depend much more on the mainland than they think. It is not as simple as water or food supply. The sooner they realize, the more advantageous.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-3 14:18 編輯
回復  peter236

(1) 太細? 睇你點睇,正如在下講過,一年迪迪尼,一年振災,一年高鐵,一年機場擴建,一 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 04:57

I don't see how Chinese companies benefit greatly from " 一年高鐵,一年機場擴建".
All these contracts are awarded to various international, Hong Kong  and some Chinese companies.
I think I posted linked proving this already. Perhaps you misssed it.

For example:
L.A. Firm Wins Design Contract for $2B Underground High-Speed Rail Terminus in Hong Kong

http://www.worldpropertychannel. ... ay-corp-ltd-957.php

Hong Kong Express rail link contracts awarded.
http://www.expressraillink.hk/en ... tracts-awarded.html

As we can see, the contracts of Hong Kong's express rail link are awarded to various foreign, Hong Kong, and Chinese companies, not just Chinese companies.

Hong Kong constructions mainly benefit local Hong Kong workers and imported workers from South East Asia.

But in any case, the scale of infrastructure projects in China are way bigger than those in Hong Kong.
Just Shenzhen alone has more infrastructure projects (railways, subways, airport buildings) going on than in Hong Kong, LOL.

迪迪尼


As they are now building a much bigger Disney in Shanghai, they don't need to go to Hong Kong's, LOL.

香港中小企

HK factories were making textiles and toys 30 yrs ago. Now they are still making textiles and toys.
They need to move up the value chain themselves, like those in Taiwan and Korea.

但係蠢到加另一嘅人先會咁做


Of course they are not going to squeeze out HK. But HK people need to realize their position. They are more dependent on China than they think.

TOP

用 PR 數據去做substantiation?  殺死人無命賠喎~    似乎你間學校認真油麻地。
扑街咯,在下犯左大錯,同 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 15:13

In other words, you can't provide your proof for substantiation?

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-3 17:41 編輯
高鐵工程外判比外國公司 ?你一定覺得好驕傲,搵到呢頁數據。本來無興趣同你講,但是再三估計,講你也未必 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 17:17

You keep on talking and taking, still you don't have proof for anything.
The point here is that, the contracts are awarded to various local and foreign companies.
The foreign companies take some profits, and the local workers take some. In the construction business, contracts are split into many subcontracts, this is just normal. Everyone take a cut and can benefit.

We do not know which company makes more. Usually the contractor at the top makes the most. But somehow you would rather see a French company makes more, than a Chinese company makes more. This is just self-discriminatory logic.

TOP

回復  peter236


    拗頸,係無用嘅。
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 17:37


hope you can understand this.

TOP

返回列表