返回列表 發帖
原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-21 10:08 發表


what the heck are you talking about? I 've told you I'm against killing


Good, so speak up against Lancer.

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-21 11:43 發表


why do i need to against Lancer

against a point of view of a person DOES NOT equal to against a person
go to take a 1st year logic course please


you're right, his point of view of killing believers DOES NOT equal to against the believers.  Good logic.

Let me say this in a different way.  Why are you not speaking up against Lancer's point of view of killing believers?

[ 本帖最後由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 11:56 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 13:44 發表

Thanks for being so frank and let us know you are gutless.



Let me correct you.  It's anyone who is afraid of posting their e-mail address here as gutless, not just me.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 13:48 發表

Please wake up.
We said we "against killing", means actual killing. Did Lancer really kill someone (yet)? Or you knew that he already kill someone? How come we should against someone "killing others  ...


Wake up, it's against the law to publicly say things like "execute all believers".  The term for this is "hate crime", regardless of actual killing or not.

TOP

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 14:42 發表
HAHAHA, 美國法例, 笑死人
你知唔知呢度咩國家呀?
同你知唔知點先算hate crime呀, 無腦
只係對一個individual group 進行歧視就叫hate crime
你睇清楚, 我支持既唔只係所有信徒死, 連人類都要滅亡
係回應硬膠膠個時 ...


You must have a reading problem.  I gave you a Canadian case also.  Besides, giving you the US laws just to prove to you how wrong you are when you said only one country has the law against internet hate crime.  And I haven't even make fun of you for throwing at us the Canadian Charter of Rights about a HONG KONG pastor.

And in one post you clearly said to execute believers, that's an identificable group (people who has religious beliefs).

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 15:04 發表

Let me correct you too. Are you stereotyping everyone here for not posting their e-mail address is gutless?
Let me remind you again, my reason for not posting it not because of I'm gutless but I hav ...


Are you trying to correct my POV?  MJJ was right.  You're always right.

TOP

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 15:07 發表
如果你唔知呢, 香港係都有條平等法案防止歧視, 傻西. 如果唔係你點解覺得咁多時事評論家咁關於位KT今次件事呀, 白痴.

hahaha, 傻西, 美國從來無明文係寫關於網上言論, 只係南韓有, 你見晒用部法規先吠啦. 就算係要 ...


haha, specifically written or not, it's still punishable. The court cases has proven that. That's the point.  You're really showing us how little you know about the law.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 15:00 發表

You still don't get my point.
I say, I "against actual killing", but I don't against "killing my mouth" (just speaking). It's me, nothing related to the actual law. So, am I offending the law that I  ...



You don't get my point.  Christian say this or that you have a problem with, Lancer say to kill them you have no problem with.  I'm pointing out your bias.

TOP

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 15:23 發表
idiot, forum is considered as a private internet area
like as i told u so many times, less barking, more doing


And as I point out to you, people have been found guilty for posting hatred writing on the internet.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 15:38 發表

What is your POV? You stereotyping all people don't post their e-mail address here is gutless? Then, what did I say wrong?



No, I'm saying my POV is that the reason of "not wanting to get distributed in real life" is gutless.  i.e. I' afraid of getting distributed too, that's why I'm not posting mine, and I'm calling myself gutless.

TOP

返回列表