It’s a chance for Canada to work its soft-power magic, the way it did in the 1990s when it helped create the International Criminal Court and pushed for UN measures to protect civilians, he says.
“Canada continues to be in a very strategic position. … We’ve got wealth, we’ve got a good diplomatic system and we should be putting that more actively to work.”
Axworthy also wants to see more boots on the ground: “For God’s sake, let’s do something in the Congo.”
At the UN, Canada has pushed for change as a member of a group of countries called Friends of Women, Peace and Security, and through the umbrella agency, UN Women. And it remains a key player in multilateral projects such as the Joint Initiative to Reduce Sexual Violence in the DRC, offering training to more than 5,400 political leaders and funding health care for survivors.
Last fall, Canada launched a National Action Plan on sexual violence in conflict zones, in response to a series of UN resolutions.
The sweeping plan calls for a host of measures, such as improving peacekeeper training, increasing women’s participation in the peace process and ensuring they get the aid they need. The directives apply across “the whole of government,” and the plan includes a list of “indicators,” or ways of measuring compliance.
“It’s a positive step that will move Canada in the right direction,” says Lindsay Mossman of Amnesty International.
However, it’s also a case of better late than never, she adds: the plan was tabled 10 years after a UN Security Council resolution first called on its members to do more to protect women.
In fact, Canada was 21st among the 24 countries to introduce national action plans so far, behind Ivory Coast and even Rwanda, according to the UN watchdog group, PeaceWomen.
“We’re supposed to be an international leader on women’s rights,” says Mossman. “Whereas the government of Liberia had an action plan. So why didn’t we?”
Claude Rochon, of the Department of Foreign Affairs, says the 2000 UN resolution “did not call for action plans” specifically, noting that it was several years later that UN Secretary General Kofi Annan put out the call.
Nonsense, retorts Diana Sarosi, policy manager for the Nobel group. Security Council resolutions are binding, so Canada should have come up with a plan in 2000, rather than waiting until Annan prodded laggards with a call for action in 2005, she says.
Even then, “it still took five years,” she adds |