原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表 
If you think a certain company's CEO is useless, which would imply that the company is badly governed impacting profit and bottom line, just don't invest in it. I think that's a very strong action. Or if you think the CEO is useless and wasting money, cutting into the bottom line of a company you already invested, pull ur investment. Otherwise, why do I really care whether another company have a useless CEO? I never talked about CEOs anyways, I am talking about the very government that is impacting your daily life, and that you've paid 10s of Ks, if not 100s of Ks every year to.
人地拿一拿CEO例子,冇咩問題。我冇INVEST。就算知到好多高層係廢柴咁又點?個個都知FC廢,有幾多個會真係UNSUBSCRIBE?同樣,你覺得政府廢,你炒佢咩。唔係翹埋隻手乜都唔做。熱血青年係好,但係社會就係有LEVEL。
原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表 
Venting, or in much more accurate and better terms, acknowledgement and spreading awareness, is not useless. Encouraging other to shut up about issues, by telling people that acknowledgement and spreading awareness is 'useless', is not only as simple as 'suffering in silence', but to promote the act of 'suffering in silence'.
同你講左好多次,我地UP得,好明顯我地ACKNOWLEDGE & SPREADING AWARENESS啦。霽UP係冇用架BOR。做嘅有限,咪繼續UP&SPREAD AWARENESS囉。冇CONFLICT架。嚟度邊個叫人SHUT UP?我唔覺,除左你拿出嚟討論。
原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表 
There's no point to further discuss if you don't even agree that acknowledging issues and promoting awareness is a vital start in address any issues. I think this is especially vital when a lot of people don't even view this (Canadian authorities' compensation and efficiency) as an issue, as can be seen by a lot of LYKs that were defending the compensation level and effectiveness of the Canadian police force in this very post.
如上題。
原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-2-12 14:08 發表 
Our tax money is being spent very foolishly on our ineffective government, especially when compared to other places in the world, that there's still much room for improvement that we as tax-payer should demand. Moreover, there's still much room for improvement on how much we as tax-payer have been demanding in getting more efficiency on the return on our tax-money. I don't need half my bonus to go to buying tasers which are going to be used on innocent victims anymore, doesn't this alone justify the cause (of spreading awareness, etc)?
想請教,你各自認為邊度政府係EFFICIENT?錯唔錯係TASER嘅發明,亦都唔係POLICE嘅宗旨,係個人操守同科技技術出錯嘅問題。
[ 本帖最後由 B仔 於 2009-2-12 15:00 編輯 ] |