Nam

BMW is the same...

My brother drove his wife's brother to check out a 325i, they only let them test the demo car. After testing the demo car, they want to test the actual car ....

Then the sales BS them "Actually, if you want to test the actual car, you have to put down $500 deposit to test it because we have another customer who are very interested in that car as well" ...

Then my brother walk away because that's so unreasonable........after that day, the sales keep calling them and left few msgs (obviously, there is no other competitor, they just want to forced customer to put down deposit)

We ended up buying in bby, nicer service and nicer price as well..
Richmond serivce suck!

Nam

No ar, we are not buying new car..
We want to buy 2006 model and we want to test the used car..
but the sales said the demo car is just the same as the 2006... and asked us to test the new demo car first...

Gum ng tong test new car and decided the 2006 used car is ok as well?

Nam

Of course I understand buying new car will test the demo car.  
May be I dunno car enough?

I thought if ppl want to buy a used car, customer will test drive the used car not the brand new car/demo car?? And why should we put down $500 deposit to test a used car?

And 2009 will not be the same as 2006...

Nam

可能我見識淺，我真係未聽過試used car，要放低五舊deposit 先叫做reasonable!

如果依個係normal practice, 咁我唯有受教，下次擺低五舊水先試架舊車啦！

可能我expectation 太過份，我無expect 入車行自己齋睇車十幾分鐘無人serve,要自己請個sales大佬serve 我，亦唔知道唔可以要求過份坷刻，無諗過試完架新demo 車，等同試完架舊車！