快樂牛郎

Now we know that they inflated the numbers.  But does that mean there's no global warming then?

快樂牛郎

I am not interested in Science.  I am only interested in Logic.

快樂牛郎

Even the argument of global warming is flaw.  Then is that enough for you?
kipposhi 發表於 2010/2/3 18:45

How is it flawed?  I am no expert on this topic.

快樂牛郎

As there are so many wrong information in the argument presented by warmists, I will just pick one of them now.

Carbon Dioxide:



The above few quotes are easy to understand, right?
kipposhi 發表於 2010/2/4 02:06

So let's assume that CO2 is good for trees.
But how do we know whether it caused global warming or not?

One of the quotes says that historically CO2 levels were much higher.  Which period are we talking about?  Were human existant at that time?

快樂牛郎

咁如果你真係覺得自己已經做左d 野幫助保護環境, 咁就最好不過啦~

自己覺得同現實係2回事