rainbow-davie

烈士??? 你有無野呀?

你都唔識野. 美國係有好嚴格科技出口管制.  波音一入去就有Training 要小心資料, 因為係會構成犯罪. 即使係傅檔案黎加拿大或其他盟國都好嚴. 佢知法犯法, 係一定入罪.

rainbow-davie

點烈? alright... 在你角度, 唔理係唔係犯罪, 只要對中共有利, 就係烈士.  對不對?

rainbow-davie

LYK 各位愛共人士, 小弟欽敬你地.

但成日得把口點愛黨愛國無用wor , 得把口, 唔行動, 人民瞧不起你地.

咁啦, 為左俾所有人見到你地真係有愛國心, 你地不如付之行動!

soli 同 peter 擔大旗, 加埋嘍囉三五人, 去NASA or Area 51 偷美國高科技機密, 又去捉總理哈巴同澳總陸克文去見胡主席跪地請罪,  再五花大綁達賴喇嘛, 順便去銀行劫富濟貧 俾中國農民.

你地為左令中國科技發展, 面子, 民族和諧同$$$, 就算俾人地捉到判死刑也好, 終身監禁也好, 都唔會俾人地忘記你地. 烈士們. 去吧. 死吧.

rainbow-davie

Lik, yeah we all know the spy charges on Rio Tinto was intentional. But what does this tell us about the western people? This tells us they are still racist against the Chinese and wanted to shut the ...
peter236 發表於 2009-7-17 15:01

on 9.
國與國保護自己利益係正常.  中國成日都以國家機密鎖人啦.
小至個人亦如是. 唔通你會同anyone share your money, your knowlege, or share your wife?  
on nan 9.

rainbow-davie

you stupid moron, China has every right to protect its own state secrets, just like any other country. So how come the US/UK/Japan can spy on China and the Chinese are not allowed to catch those spie ...
peter236 發表於 2009-7-17 16:05

u on 9 7. then same as US and other countries have the right to protect their state secrets.  
so, you on 9 7 guys think that China spy US technology is totally ok. and those ppl should be 烈士. and US should not spy on China, and those ppl should be criminal, right?

rainbow-davie

Hmm... according to multiple articles... the defendent's lawyer claims that:

A - true, indeed the defendent have violated Boeing's policy is storing these documents outside of the company designated  ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2009-7-17 17:24

小弟有幸係波音做過.
1) 合約上寫明所有資料係保密.  
2) 講到明美國政府係有好嚴格出口限制. Export Regurlation. 任何cross border, even just through Internet 係要好小心, 同要得到approval.
3) 成日有關於呢方面既 training

裡面個個都知, 講到明公司export restricted 文件唔可以隨便帶返屋企, 就算俾老婆見都唔得, 更何況第三者或販賣.

so, 點佢都係衰左.