馮仁昭四圍超：梁榮忠批老師惹起公憤 梁, 都

Lik

梁車震講埋啲咁嘅說話，我又一啲都唔出奇喎？

-力

Lik

The teacher is quite stupid. what does she know about politics?
peter236 發表於 2010-5-22 14:21

LOL~

What makes you think she doesn't know anything about politics? <Starting Rockypath mode> Where is your evidence of that? I challenge you to prove your claim! <Rockypath mode off>

Obviously, Miss Ng knows a heck of a lot more about civic responsibility than you do.

Moron...

-Lik

Lik

Second, do you know this 變相公投 has no opposition? Could you tell me how would I be able to say “NO” to against變相公投行動 other than not vote since any vote (include blank votes and votes to another person who does not be long to 公民兩黨) will be counted as supports to their action.

I will be waiting for your answer to tell me what I can do if I want to say no to this 變相公投行動 other than not voting.
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-23 17:43

賤精，毓民由始至終都只係話會計（亦只係計咗）公社兩黨同埋大專2012 嘅票作為支持公投。投其他人嘅票同白票就唔會（亦無）計入支持公投嘅行列，亦即係算為反對公投嘅票。所以就算響九龍東只有梁家傑同埋 2012個大專生作為候選人，市民要表達反對公投嘅話亦可以投白票。

你要扭曲事實來抹黑今次公投運動就唔該你死開啲！而且呢個 point 你、Peter、定 Soli 呢三隻賤之前已經嘗試講過，但我亦經已指正你嘅謬論。

唔該你早日去死啦。

-力

Lik

I had showed you the quotes from news and you read it. In case you still could not recall, here is the link. What I said is in post #13.
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-24 10:43

Refer to post #28 la, Stupid.

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... p;extra=&page=3

-Lik

Lik

When 公社兩黨 said they would measure their success based on voter turn-out rate (投票率), was it true that they meant they would count every vote as long as it was cast regarless it is blank or a vote to any candidate?

JUST TELL EVERYONE PLAINLY. DON'T AVOID IT!!! JUST "YES" OR "NO" WILL DO!!!
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-24 15:40

Gee... You're totally making a lot of sense. Don't try to twist things out of context as you always do la. If voters came out to vote, but cast blank ballots or voted against the referendum issue (by voting for candidates other than LSD/CP, or Post-Secondary 2012 people), can that be counted towards as support for the referendum?

Stupid is as stupid does...

-Lik

Lik

The voting turnout was so low. This shows the people do not support such a money wasting vote. Mad dog wong yuk man should resign as he promised.
peter236 發表於 2010-5-24 18:52

So Disney was not a waste of money, eh? (And of all things, the funds infused by the SAR government came from HK people's tax dollars). And at HKD$10k per head, the high speed train is not a waste of tax dollars? And the 副局長、政治助理 is not a waste of tax dollars? And Bowtie recently lifted one of the Establishment's people (some young dude from Yip Lau's camp) into the CEO office. The person used to be a district councilor in south HK:

http://www.hkatvnews.com/v3/shar ... atvnews_139866.html

南區區議員陳岳鵬獲聘為特首辦特別助理
2010-05-17

南區區議員陳岳鵬獲聘為行政長官辦公室特別助理。

二十七歲的陳岳鵬，是匯賢智庫創會會員。他將會在後天，即星期三上任，並辭去區議員和匯賢智庫職務。民建聯立法會議員陳克勤亦曾被委任為特首辦特別助理。

So the resulting by-election is not a waste of tax dollars? And of all people and places, it was the HKCEO Office that lifted him! Why do I not the SAR government portrait that as a waste of tax dollars?

I haven't even mentioned the extra days (or extra large hall) that the SAR government rented at HKCEC as part of the referendum/by-election. There was absolutely no need for that, except for boosting the cost of the referendum/by-election. Is that not a waste of tax dollars?

At $20/head, the referendum was cheap, cheap public education, especially given all the dirty tricks that the SAR government tried to pull.

-Lik

Lik

Blah~ you're a total waste of time. Go suck your CPC master's toes la~

-Lik