Lik

其實我以前都提過吓，漢族對中國其他小數民族同佢地嘅文化根本就毫無尊重。對中央來講（權力核心根本全部都係漢人），其他民族嘅地區根本只係資源開發地，比次殖民地更低等。佢要嘅係你嘅資源，完全唔係要帶歇你、同你一齊 win-win咁去發達。你肯卑躬屈膝咁去俯首稱臣，放棄自己原有嘅種族民化，接受佢嘅統治嘅話，咁都仲可以俾返啖飽飯你食，甚至達都有得你發。蒙古如此、新疆如此、青藏亦如此。而且如果你放眼睇吓中國對外嘅政策（特別係對中東同非洲），佢地嘅發展模式亦係完全一樣。話就話幫你開發資源，但佢嘅出發點永遠都只係要為自己搵資源，而唔係真心咁去幫你，又或者去尋求雙贏、共榮等等嘅事。

而且中共中央大力慫恿漢人移居到全國原本係非漢族地區嘅地方，咁樣其實就係間接地咁逐步漢化其他民族同地區，以達成中國大一統嘅理念。到時原住民變成少數，要數人頭、鬥大聲嘅話你都唔夠佢人多，所以就算想同佢爭都好難爭。

呢一個慢性、間接式嘅侵略方法，其實係中共一貫嘅慣用技倆。

-力

Lik

For Africa, the news that I've learned suggest that the bulk of the important operations only bring in Mainland Chinese workers from the China itself. Locals are often only hired to fulfill the most rudimentary, low class type of work. So as far as employment is concerned, the engineering projects doesn't really benefit the local economy all that much. Furthermore, for one reason or another, local talents are often not tapped into even when it comes to maintenance work and such, so the African states must continue to rely on the Chinese for post-construction support.

A good example of this behaviour can be seen in the Chinese oil firm's massive evacuation in Libya a few months ago. Upwards of 35,000 nationals were evacuated when the war broke out. There were that many Chinese to evacuate precisely because the industrial operations do not hire enough locals to help them with their work.

On the other hand, if you look at any foreign investment business in China, Chinese laws require that firms conduct the business in conjunction with Chinese partner firms. Automotive manufacturing is an especially good example because all foreign companies must form joint ventures with local Chinese manufacturers and hire the bulk of the workers from within China. In doing this, the Chinese benefits from the foreign investment. But they do not practice the same thing when they are the foreign investors themselves.

If this is not an example of double standards, I don't know what is.

-Lik

Lik

If there're enough local workers that are as skillful, cheap and obedient, I don't think they need to export workers from China... What they do will be exporting management staffs to those countries instead...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-5-27 11:36

That's what normal people would expect, but unfortunately, I can't see how that is the case.

Going back to China, do you know how they discriminate against the ethnic minorities? The Hans are moving en masse into the ethnic minorities' regions, and the investment are coming from the Hans. But in order for the local ethnic groups to find work, they need to speak Mandarin instead of their native language to find work. This happens in Mongolia, in Xinjiang, in Tibet, etc.

Do you not see something wrong with that approach? Effectively, the Hans are using their population size as the overwhelming force to invade into a "foreign" region, displace the original ethnic groups there, and then force them to adopt the Hans language and culture in order to survive. This is why there is so much ethnic tension in Xinjiang for the longest time. This is why ethnic Tibetans feel their culture and religion are being invaded. In ecological terms, this would be known as an invasive behaviour, and the species would be labeled as an invasive species.

Distinct cultures need to be respected and protected to live on. Canada is one of the few countries that does this very well, and I would say that respect for ethnic diversity is one of the core modern Canadian values. Mainland China, on the other hand, has absolutely no respect in this area.

-Lik

Lik

I am not saying our Canadian forefathers did it right. In fact, even when I was in grade 9 studying Canadian history, I already knew the British colonists were fxxking bastards. The French colonists, were far more Native-friendly and respectful.

And yet the Chinese (Hans) today are doing exactly what the British Imperialists did back in the 1800's, and that makes them fxxking bastards too. In this day and age, it doesn't have to be that way.

Looking closer to HK, the amount of 推普殺粵 effort you see in Guangzhou is phenomenal, and this is something we have already discussed before on the forum in other threads.

-Lik

Lik

Wrong. If I were the top Chinese leader, I would definitely let them leave if that is what the people's wishes are. I hold exactly the same opinion towards Quebec as well -- if the Quebecois think they'd be better off leaving confederation, and more importantly, can stand on their own two feet as a separate country without relying on Ottawa for all that federal assistance, so be it. Let them leave. It might be sad, but is it the end of the world? A government's no. 1 priority is to make sure its citizen's wishes and desires are met. Why do you (and the Chinese leaders) insist that a single biga$$ China is superior if that isn't what the people want?

If language and cultural difference were the sole factors that could cause countries to separate, then both Canada and the US would have broken into tens and hundreds of little countries already. Closer to China, if what you are saying is true, then Guangzhou and the Shanghai region would have broken off into their own little countries a long time ago as well.

Through the intentional slow death of the Shanghaiese and Cantonese language, you can see how little respect the central government has towards language and cultural preservation.

-Lik

Lik

重有，如果我真係中國最高領導人嘅話，我第一件會做嘅事就係立即廢除報禁同黨禁。咁做嘅話，中國共產黨嘅管治自然會立即好似前蘇聯咁土崩瓦解。但當年蘇聯執咗笠，咁世界又是否末日？由前蘇聯分裂出來嘅一眾小國，幾多都唔知幾高興可以脫離蘇共嘅魔掌！而俄羅斯自己又因為蘇聯解體而滅亡咩？

戇車！

-力

Lik

In the grand scheme of things, is a person's desire to hang on to power (as a leader) more important? or are democracy and the good of mankind more significant?

而且，話你狗改不了吃屎就的確係狗改不了吃屎。Quebec話要獨立你就派軍隊去鎮壓嘅話，你唔俾人diu爆你屎忽同祖宗十八代先至奇呀！以前 Quebec 連獨立公投都試過啦？你又幾時見聯邦政府有考慮過派軍隊去鎮壓個公投？

係阿爺先至連果少少風吹草動都會驚餐死。一個小香港搞個變相公投，阿爺就即刻龍顏大怒，仲要家陣wear爛塊面來堵塞「漏動」咁樣衰...

-力