富商子無牌醉駕輕判服務令 富商

Lik

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/inews/20100803/gb21023a.htm

富商子無牌醉駕輕判服務令 (10:22)

上市公司豐德麗副主席唐家榮的18歲兒子，涉無牌駕駛及醉駕等5罪名，被判150小時社會服務令。

報稱西島中學學生的被告唐俊德（18歲），承認未獲授權使用車輛、無牌駕駛、醉酒駕駛、無第三者保險及不小心駕駛罪。裁判官判他接受150小時社會服務令，罰款12000元。

裁判官表示，被告感化報告正面，並做慈善工作，學業成績良好，認為監禁刑罰並不適合。

案情指今年3 月27 日凌晨1 時許，被告返回西環碧荔道住所，未獲其父批准取去其車匙，接載其17歲女性友人回家。當他們到達西環域多利道時失控，撞向對面行車線的士。警方到場調查後發現，被告沒駕駛執照和第三者保險。其後被告被帶返警署，其呼氣中的酒精比例是100 毫升中有33 微克，超出法例限制的22 微克。肇事的士司機送院檢查，頭和右膝有觸痛，同日出院。

【案件編號：ESCC2268/10】

Lik

無牌駕駛同 DD 都可以甩身？！

我只可以話，香港真係同大陸嘅司法制度一體化囉～

-力

Lik

低能仔，

我真係唔該你放屁之前用吓個腦啦～家陣你估條靚仔淨係斷正醉酒駕駛一單野咩？

無錯，就算係響溫哥華呢道，醉酒駕駛被捉到嘅話，初犯多數都只係 up to 3幾個月嘅 driving suspension。但咁判嘅話，一來個司機本身係有牌，二來如果要判得輕，個司機係唔會被charge危險／不小心駕駛嘅呢條罪。但家陣呢個高幹子弟哥哥仔係：

1）無牌駕駛
2）醉酒駕駛
3）不小心駕駛罪
4）無第三者保險及

你試吓響呢道連斷呢四樣，睇吓係咪淨係判社會服務令同罰錢咁間單？！

而更重要嘅係，依家香港係司法不公。有錢人就可以逍遙法外，窮人就注定要含撚。試吓換咗係個普通市民靚仔咁樣斷正同樣嘅四條罪，你又睇吓佢係咪只係判社會服務令同罰錢咁間單？！

顛倒是非嘅賤精，去不該啦你！

-力

Lik

Hong Kong's legal system is a British system where new cases are based on previous cases.
peter236 發表於 2010-8-3 11:19

LOL~

This idiotic comment alone shows you how much you know...

-Lik

Lik

Moron, you still don't get it, eh?

For the record, 33mg is 50% more than 22mg. More importantly, he is charged with these 4 violations:

1）無牌駕駛
2）醉酒駕駛
3）不小心駕駛罪
4）無第三者保險

Is a 50% higher blood alcohol level only "slightly above limit" as you say? Does doing well in school means the kid can be above the law? Most importantly, does being rich means he can be above the law?

Cowboy is as 賤 as the moron, but at least he doesn't try to put forth idiotic arguments as you do.

-Lik

Lik

Lik, you are wrong, if it happens in Canada, this young guy will be released without any 社會服務令 ...
samsung 發表於 2010-8-4 11:01

Moron,

If you want to put up a valid argument, at least get your facts straight la. The Richmond RCMP, Jimmy Ng, was killed by a speeding motorist. That person was sentenced to 18+6  months worth of jail time:

http://www.odmp.org/canada/officer/718-constable-jimmy-ng

The street racing incident that killed Irene Thorpe resulted in a 2 year sentence. Unfortunately, it was a conditional sentence with terms that are far too lenient.

In both cases, there is no mention that the drivers did not have their driver licences, so it is reasonable to assume they had them. Also, the incidents were not drunk driving.

I never said Canada and the Western world are the best. I only insist that HK is getting consistently worse, to the point of reaching lawlessness for the rich, and severe injustice for the poor. And then there is China, which is way worse.

-Lik