返回列表 發帖
提名權、選舉權、被選權,而且要係普及而平等果隻。

呢個其實絕對唔係 rocket science,但照個勢來睇,阿爺似乎打算再一次扭曲民主嘅定義,只係俾香港你一人一票嘅選舉權,但提名權同被選權就落響阿爺嘅手裡面,亦即係佢可以 make sure 選出來嘅一定係佢嘅人,可以受中央操控。

有中國特色嘅民主...你不如話有中國特色嘅獨裁啦~

-力

TOP

不如我講下加拿大有幾唔民主啦。
加拿大現在要18歲先可以投票﹐但人人不限年齡交稅(HST).
有超過20%既公民無得投票(0-17歲)﹐亦無議員代表佢地﹐嚴重違反左國際人權公約﹐非常之不民主!!
soli 發表於 2010-7-4 08:13

真係要向你講返句:Thank you!我真係世估唔到啲咁超級無敵笑爆咀嘅野你都可以講得出~

-力

TOP

唔該你柄埋一邊思考吓咩叫做 age of majority先至好返來啦~

淨係識得講埋啲低能野來徙我時間...

-力

TOP

民主的本質及意義就係要包容其他唔同意見及主張,如有分歧就通過協商、談判從而取得共識(絕大多數認同).
When was the last time Lik 包容其他唔同意見?
Prelude 發表於 2010-7-5 02:27

核心價值唔同,又邊到有得協商?你鍾意做狗,我只願意做人,根住你呢隻賤狗就話我咁樣唔民主?哈!

你鍾意做狗,我從來都無咗止過你。

Lik would never agree with this - "我不同意你的觀點,但我誓死捍衛你說話的權利。"

There is no such term in his definition of democracy.
rockypath 發表於 2010-7-5 02:49



我有阻過你發言嘅權利?哈!真係笑爆咀!In fact,我最鍾意睇住你不斷響到宣揚你嘅謬論,因為咁樣只會令到你自己更可笑~




-力


TOP

本帖最後由 Lik 於 2010-7-5 14:50 編輯
Lik pretends to be expert on various issues, but he is just a sor jai.
peter236 發表於 2010-7-5 14:21

Never pretended to be an expert on almost anything wor? Just that it's quite obvious that I am a lot smarter than you are~

-Lik
p.s. Oh wait, that really isn't saying much since you're such a dumba$$~

TOP

返回列表