lo_pak

After the Japan nuclear outbreak, people are more concern about the safety issue regarding to nuclear power. This is a positive development.
While Tokyo is 250km away from Fukushima, Dayawan is only 70-80km from HK. It's just like having a bomb, even if you don't utilize it and claim it is safe, there's still a chance that an accident will happen.
From the experience we learnt from Japan, an open and un-biased information exchange forum/report system should be setup between the plant and the public. The clearer the message/information being disclosed, the lesser the confusion to generate unnecessary discomfort.
Concurrently, there is a need to educate the general public some basics about nuclear power.
I trully don't want to see any more uncivilized behaviours carried out by the public that will disgrace our Chinese society.

lo_pak

回復 7# boss2007

I don't know too much about Murphy's Law.

Back to your assumption, if the core is totally meltdown like Chernobyl, the first impact will be the most nearby cities (within 10kms) as they are under direct nuclear explosure of the explosion. The rest will be affected by the dusts mostly. So, atmospheric condition plays a dominent role in this scenario.

Pollutants will travel in 3 forms, namely diffusion, dispersion and radiation. If you ask me what's the safety radius for evaculation if a total meltdown did happen (source is out of control), as far as I can recall, it's about 30kms. Does that mean after 30kms the exlusion zone is safe, it is certainly negative. It very well depends on how the wind blow (you can tell by the location of the US aircraft warrior)...

Within the 30kms inclusion zone, the time to evaculate will be as soon as possible.
Out of the 30kms exclusion zone, it depends on the wind speed.

Touch wood, if Dayawan is having a class 7 accident, the reaction time for HK needs to be very fast...

Some fellows in the forum complained that Fukushima is located in an earthquake zone and proclaimed it's an irresponsible decision by the Japs government to have a plant over there. I will say, hay, have you seen Dayawan? How can you justify the risk if on one day Taiwan is at war with China and a missile flying out from either the States/Taiwan aircraft mistakenly/accidentally hit on the plant...