lo_pak

回復 1# chobit

Nothing special...

lo_pak

回復 3# fy789

Your proposition is OK, but you forgot the time line...

lo_pak

回復 5# chobit

Obviously those fellows know nothing but blaming...

There are so many factors involved...

lo_pak

回復 6# fy789

Ask yourself, why would UK starts thinking of returning HK in the late 70's, the time when cultural revolution has "just" finished...

Funny enough, it's the UK that started the talk...

Your comments make me feel like you don't have any knowledge for the history background of that period...

lo_pak

回復 9# fy789

How would they know in advance capitalism can be succeed in a communist country after post Mao ages... I don't think you have called up a good point at all this time...

lo_pak

回復 11# fy789

If it's like what you've said, then UK must be a genius gambler that win most of the time because they know the tricks...

lo_pak

回復 15# peter236

Peter, are you from HK or from other planet? Or you are just a very simple C9 who knows nothing but gossiping at the marketplace?

lo_pak

回復 13# fy789

I would rather like using the term "strategetic planning" on this regard...
UK, as the origin of insurance and modern banking, on risk management, there is nothing called luck, but chance and risk (or you can call it as opportunity cost in economic)...

lo_pak

回復 18# peter236

What time frame of history you are referring to? Post 76 or post 84? Without Deng Xiaoping, don't expect China can get back HK ... Most senior grandpas are still on 9 9 that time...

lo_pak

回復 20# fibbi

Have I been talking too much?