返回列表 發帖
回復 1# samsung

I don't think you can do anything without any witness these days...

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-8-14 10:20 編輯

回復 6# fibbi

ICBC is getting mean and cheap nowadays... You could try, without witness they may blame the damage is caused by you...
That's why, getting an witness is almost "the most important" after an accident has occurred...

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-8-14 10:49 編輯

回復 8# fibbi

The main reason is - ICBC insurance adjusters are commission based these days, the more they can save for ICBC, the higher their commissions are...

For your own good, it's highly recommended for all drivers to leave a longer stopping distance to your front car... In an accident, if 5 cars were hit in a row, without an witness ALL the 4 cars at the back are ALL FAULTY even those 3 toasted car are completely stop!

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-8-14 11:09 編輯

回復 11# B2L2

Your info used to be true in the old days but not recently...

In your example how can you feel a single hit if your car is being toasted?

"Assigning faulty among all parties" has become a trend internally by ICBC if evidents are not self proved... Any idea why ICBC gets less in claims within the last few years?

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2012-8-14 12:56 編輯

回復 13# B2L2

If it's only a 3-car accident, it could be the case because evident is quite "self-explanatory"...
My friend got in a 5-car accident couple months back, it's what the lawyer said to him...
I've got a back hit about an year ago and it's a 4-car accident. Being the front car driver I got no issue. The 3 pickups behind me get differential shares of liability.

TOP

返回列表