本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-4-23 21:47 編輯
http://www.policedriving.com/article78.htm
By Roy Wood
Post staff reporter
When police chases left two innocent bystanders dead during a recent four-day period in Hamilton County, the deaths brought renewed urgency to the long controversial question of when -- or even whether -- officers should engage in risky high-speed pursuits.
In one of the fatal accidents, a teen-age driver who allegedly drove away from a gas station without paying for gas later struck and killed a 52-year-old pedestrian while being pursued by a Hamilton County sheriff's deputy in a chase that approached 90 mph.
Although Hamilton County Sheriff Simon Leis has defended the deputy's actions, others have faulted the decision, arguing that a stolen tank of gas is never worth risking the lives of officers, other drivers, pedestrians or even suspects themselves.
Even before the latest incidents, some police departments, in the tri-state and elsewhere, had begun adopting new pursuit policies aimed at tempering cops' natural instinct to do whatever it takes to catch the bad guys. In Fairfield, for example, a year-old policy is based on the premise that sometimes, it's better for a bad guy to get away, at least temporarily, than to take the risks involved in trying to catch him at all costs.
Is a dangerous driving/excessive speeding ticket worth the risk to innocent road users, the officer him/herself and also the life of the offender? Chasing a Ferrari with a Impala/Crown Vic is laughable anyways.... Almost obvious that if the Ferrari decides to run, the chase won't end until one of the party crashes.... Just a matter of crashing to a light pole or crashing into a pedestran...
So yes, 警察係唔應該追快車嘅. That's why Constable Bill Kim don't dare calling it a 'chase'... |