BiscottiGelato

know it sucks when you can't enjoy a little privacy in your own home, but really, she needs to take some responsibility for dressing like that at home as well law.
Lik 發表於 2010-6-22 10:25

Don't think what's wrong with how she's dressed for staying at home. I agree with CP and a few others "most people wear like that at home".

It's really nothing too special other than the fact that she didn't wear pants, which is quite normal around the house. Obviously not something you want to be taken pictures of. Whether there's any reasonable expectation of privacy it is up for moral and legal debates.

IMO I dun think she did anything wrong. Being a celebrity/public figure doesn't mean that you can't enjoy what the regular people enjoy in a private place like your own home. The magazine/photog might not have done anything illegal, but even so it's definately immoral. I hope people would be smart enough to recognize that instead of being naively manipulated by the media in placing blames on almost any and everybody that is already being victimized by the presses.

BiscottiGelato

Is it immoral to shoot her like that when she is in the living room? I certainly don't think so law. ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-22 14:36

I don't know. I tend to think it's not too nice for me to poke my 70-200 at 12k ISO at the window of someone's private residence. As I don't want the same happen to me either just cuz my windows is open.

Obviously the paparazzi never cares sh_t, and the average dude always think celebrity have no rights to privacy, as they don't have anybody that is a public figure as part of their group of friends or family. Regardless, none of these facts makes it a right thing to do in my moral book.