返回列表 發帖
according to the above paragraph, if you want to show you are not supporting them, you should vote for the opposition, like 白姐姐
tofu 發表於 2010-5-25 08:55

呢個就係致命傷...

我d 西九朋友, 個個都唔去投票. 佢地不約而同咁同我講:"我唔支持公投(但又支持普通同廢除功能組別架woh), 唔想投黃毓民, 不過我更加唔想投白姐姐. 所以我決定唔去投票, 以表示我對公社兩黨搞呢次公投既不滿."

香港人, 好多都接受唔到今次係一次公投, 而只係當呢次係一次補選咁看待架乍.

TOP

回復  mcjohnjohn

6.4果陣, 小弟已經小六
is 小六 still primary school?
tofu 發表於 2010-5-25 09:55

maybe I should type in English. you were correct that I was a primary school student. Where you were wrong was:
"knew nothing about 6/4 at the time of 6/4"
understand?

TOP

they were wrong ... wasn't 白票 suposed to mean "I support 公投 but I don't support both Mr ...
samsung 發表於 2010-5-25 10:38

乜投白票唔係等於支持公投但唔贊成議題咩?

TOP

The voting turnout was so low. This shows the people do not support such a money wasting vote. Mad dog wong yuk man should resign as he promised.
peter236 發表於 2010-5-25 10:52

其實都只係一億五千萬. 假設香港有7.5M人口, 每人只係付出20蚊.

TOP

小弟覺得, 呢個公投係包含兩個意義:
1. 香港人支唔支持政黨咁樣搞一個公投比大家對某一d 野表態.
2. 為左"支持普選, 踢走公能組別"而表態.
贊成1 & 2, 就當然去投票支持公社啦~
贊成1 但唔贊成2, 就去投白票or 投其他人~

最麻煩就係有贊成2 但唔贊成1 既人, 同埋1 同 2都唔贊成既人. 佢地都選擇左唔去投票.
呢個就係呢一次公投既先天不足law. 如果冇左1 呢個criteria, 你話幾好呢~
祝大家永遠快樂! ^^

TOP

其實以上既野都係浪費金錢既~
應該將d 錢比哂Peter仔運去祖國建設大中華! 呵呵~

呢次公投都唔係用左好多錢之麻. 而且又唔會係recurrent costs, 濕濕碎啦~

TOP

    (2)   Did 公社兩黨say they will measure their success by the number of vote they got OR the voter turnout rate?
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-25 14:46

小弟覺得
1) voter turnout rate 係代表市民支唔支持佢地搞呢一次公投.
2) number of vote they got係代表有幾多市民支持呢一次公投既議題

有錯請更正, 謝~

TOP

You moron, go suck your British crap.
You lost the vote, so just STFU, hahaha.
peter236 發表於 2010-5-25 15:38

別在傷口處灑鹽, pls.

TOP

返回列表