puZZle

there are too many points to discuss here
so i will just pick a few for now

4）背祖離宗、枉為國人
作者明顯有斷章取義 (套用他自己的說法) "洗腦教育、誤人子弟" 之嫌


“外邦人的路，你們不要走。撒瑪利亞人的城，你們不要進。寧可往以色列家迷失的羊那裡去。”(太:10,5)
這一段跟本是指耶穌叫門徒 當時 去的地方

“耶穌說，我奉差遣，不過是到以色列家迷失的羊那裡去。”(太:15,24)
同上
耶穌所指的是他自己當時在世的任務

接下來的
太20:
19所以，你們要去，使萬民作我的門徒，奉父、子、聖靈的名給他們施洗
20 凡我所吩咐你們的，都教訓他們遵守，我就常與你們同在，直到世界的末了

就是門徒
和他升天後的工作了


3）仇視科學、指鹿為馬
"因為科學界普遍來說已承認進化論是科學事實的時候..."

um....before we talk about evolution... how about we solve the problem of where life came from first? science has never showed that life arose out of random chance has it?
Therefore, as far as we know by now, evidence towards creation is more abundant than evidence supporting abiogenesis
IMO, the burden of proof rests on the people who believe there is no creator first right?

just my 2cents

7）出賣尊嚴、自我作賤
教徒應罪就是錯
政.府高官不認錯 就大錯特錯?

[ 本帖最後由 puZZle 於 2009-1-5 21:18 編輯 ]

puZZle

hmm
may I bring up an interesting question?

why do you guys think that 1st century Christians believed that Jesus is God, when so many eyewitnesses can prove that, if it was so, He had not done any miracles/had resurrected/did not even exist?

Either Jesus was lying or playing tricks to have the bulk of people in Israel area convinced that he was God (which is not likely)
or the apostles were lying about it ( then why did they, along with so many Christians in the first century, willing to die by the hands of the Jews and Romans?

puZZle

the question is why did the very first Christians believe it if Jesus did not even resurrect, and that his body is still in the tomb (which brings us to another question, why didn't the Roman authorities just bring Jesus' corpse out to settle the rumor?)

Why were the Christians willing to die for a lie?

life > lie right?