chunsh

講得好﹐食得喊魚就要抵得餲啦
私隱? 的狗仔隊係你地半紅不黑個陣幫你地做新聞個陣又唔見你講私隱
不過李怡講得o岩, 其實阿嬌都係俾獸性同 "many"逼出黎﹐點講﹐佢都係女人﹐就
算係一樓一都有dignity o既,希望佢自愛﹐quit the game la

chunsh

原帖由 Maggie 於 2008-2-19 04:13 發表



Wa... I am so amazed... I have never seen analysis so twisted...

1> Re: "「 公 眾 人 物 的 隱 私 權 是 受 限 制 的 ， 人 們 對 其 隱 私 有 公 眾 的 興 趣 ， 故而 八 卦 狗 仔 的 追星 可 以 被 社 會 容 ...

no, u are wrong, "if 公 眾 人 物 的 隱 私 is part of 公 眾 利益 ....."
公 眾 人 物 的 隱 私 is part of those 公 眾 人 物 的 利益 too
if they dont want to get attention, go find other jobs

chunsh

原帖由 Maggie 於 2008-2-19 17:15 發表

HOWEVER, what I am trying to say is, yes people are interested... but what is the boundary?  ...

Assume that u are those stars, once you took those pics and stored by third party hand (or even your own computer), the boundary is gone. You are the one to give the "keys" to other to break that boundary

chunsh

原帖由 SAZABI 於 2008-2-20 11:16 發表


Of course, if I ever put my drawer or wallet on the street or some public place, they are up for grab   

And, I think both you and Chunsh are wrong in this case.  How do you guys know that someon ...

maybe i work in IT industry and I have been hacked before, so I know it is damn so easy for a computer with an owner who has no computer background to be hacked in

chunsh

原帖由 Maggie 於 2008-2-26 00:03 發表


so i guess we can conclude that the adaptability of HK audience is wonderfully and amazingly excellent.  All they need is more "artists" like ah-gill who doesn't have natural talent in what she is d ...

"It made me LOL when I heard the news that Chinese government will penalize "artists" who matches with the recording instead of singing live.  It's so funny..."

funny and not funny
people pay $$ to watch their live shows, not paying to listening CD
if they can't do live, then don't do it