返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-8-30 13:02 編輯
I didn't  make up anything,  that was how every time when those chinese leaders came that the medi ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-8-30 12:57


It is the Hk media that invented the term "派糖", unlike what you claimed.

TOP

  For large Chinese companies,  their HK segment is very small, unlike what you claimed.


It could be true now, but definitely not so  in the first two decades of open door, during which HK investment were like 救命草to the "totally collapsed chinese economy" (economist Steven Cheung's words) .  And that explains how shameless,  your words,  some mainlanders are  in claiming how they rescue HK now.

TOP

It is the Hk media that invented the term "派糖", unlike what you claimed.
peter236 發表於 2012-8-30 12:59



     Your way of denying mainlanders' hubris.

TOP

本帖最後由 satil 於 2012-8-30 14:05 編輯

回復 53# imvitasoy

六七八十年代, 香港幫咗大陸, 引進資金及技術, 是普遍人都知的事實. 而嗰批人輸得好慘, 係人所共知的事實. 大量國企來港借殼吸水又是事實.

正如我係另一個post話共慘黨割地賣國, 列埋邊幾個國家, 都是事實.

皮蛋仔都係話lie 呀, make up 呀來拗. 有時真係佢根本無知?? 或者被洗腦, 只懂共慘黨講嗰套??

我地都只須列清事實, 大家有眼睇咪得囉, 真係唔使理佢, 佢次次都用咁既方法嚟拗, 都無points既

TOP

回復 54# satil


    佢唔用呢啲point嚟拗根本無得拗啦。。。

TOP

回復 55# fibbi

Poor Peter... I'm okay with him when he's normal, although the chance is light...

TOP

本帖最後由 imvitasoy 於 2012-8-30 17:01 編輯
回復  imvitasoy

六七八十年代, 香港幫咗大陸, 引進資金及技術, 是普遍人都知的事實. 而嗰批人輸得好慘,  ...
satil 發表於 2012-8-30 14:00



    唔講六七八十年代,回歸後1997 到2007 十年,幾多國企經香港cap 水,單是在下糢糊+保守記憶,一個BOC 已經是二百億,未計更大的工行。單是五大內銀已經過千億。佢老味班貪官來買一世prada 都賺唔返佢哋千億呀。

仲有所謂自由行不知所謂,先唔講搶奶粉,通街大小便,頭五年的自由行,很多是香港人"被接待" 大陸人來玩,在下在香港期間,有六七次被接待過佢哋既經驗,有來自上海,廣東,海南,  哈爾濱來,有親戚,有朋友,有工作性質,無一不是在下包食包住收尾。換句話講,自由人在香港的所謂消費,有某程度是出自香港人本身的袋。
未計幾年一次的水災,地震,捐款又是億億計。最應棍當然是上次汶川,二百億? 在下都唔清楚咯,只知道捐款入到四川後無影無縱。

所以大陸人一講歷史就怕,於是佢哋嘅歷史不停地在龜縮。

TOP

But still they are shopping in HK~~  
人要面樹要皮,hkgers 基本上擺明唔喜歡大陸人,正如大陸人一 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-8-30 12:10



講到咁白, 當堂要俾個Like 你啦~ 俾多個都仲得呀!
Nowadays common sense is not common anymore

TOP

回復 57# imvitasoy


無恥無能共產黨
千年百年煙雲外,縈懷的又豈是嬝娜輕愁..縱然碎落滿空星斗,我卻無法拭去記憶中那抹小小的 偶然, 凄酸 啊以及妳 長長睫影下的淚痕

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-8-31 01:54 編輯
大量國企來港借殼吸水又是事實
satil 發表於 2012-8-30 14:00

Your point does not make any sense at all. Perhaps you don't even know how a stock exchange works.

Chinese companies are merely listed on HK's stock exchange. They are not taking money from HK, like you claimed. Many of them are multiple listed in Shanghai and New York. They have alternative stock exchanges for listing.

The investment money is mostly money from international investors, not HK money.
HK stock exchange is just a platform for international investors to invest in Chinese stocks listed on the stock exchange.

For example, foreign companies like HSBC, Standard chartered bank and Prada are listed in HK stock exchange through which international investors invest in those stocks.

Since HK's economy is very small comparatively and  Hk population is small, local HK money is very small potatoes, compared with big international investors.

Note that the biggest shareholders of large Chinese companies are usually the Chinese government itself or other big Chinese mutual funds, Chinese conglomerates or the Chinese sovereign wealth funds.

Chinese companies are actively trade in HK, so HK actually benefitted tremendously from the stock transaction fees and the stamp duty.

Without Chinese companies listing, HK stock exchange will become very small in size, and most likely will not be able to compete with big rivals like the Singapore stock exchange.

TOP

返回列表