rockypath

你明明係PK，唔通我仲要讚你係聖人？你出 post 就有五毛子收，我出 post 就徙我唔只五分鐘嘅時間。我先無你 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-26 11:17

Thank you for reconfirming the type of person you are - a coward who cannot face the facts and chooses to defend itself by rudely attacking people.

Didn't I tell you the point is that they need to win the hearts and supports of Hong Kong people but not how beautifully they can present themselves with speeches?

Lik

Didn't I tell you the point is that they need to win the hearts and supports of Hong Kong people but not how beautifully they can present themselves with speeches?
rockypath 發表於 2011-1-26 11:23

你呢挺對人不對事嘅廢物，就算事實擺在眼前，你都唔會接受唔會佢地㗎啦？

5條片 50幾分鐘，但你幾分鐘之後就覆我個post，你又有聽完大舊講過啲乜咩？我話你條契弟連聽都無聽過啦～

正PK...

-力

peter236

你呢挺對人不對事嘅廢物，就算事實擺在眼前，你都唔會接受唔會佢地㗎啦？

5條片 50幾分鐘，但你幾分鐘之 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-26 12:05

mad dog wong and 大舊 are cowards.

rockypath

你呢挺對人不對事嘅廢物，就算事實擺在眼前，你都唔會接受唔會佢地㗎啦？

5條片 50幾分鐘，但你幾分鐘之 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-26 12:05

Lik, do you have the gut to answer me directly?

First, how do you know I had not viewed the clips (just by the time I posted? are you the only source I can receive information?)? Based on what you know that are the truth and facts? Were you personally involved in the process? In addition, it is only a voice and story of one side. I don't think you would bother to listen to the story of the other side. Moreover, there are situations that it could be  合法 but not necessary 合理.

Second, do you agree that it is critical for them to win the trust, hearts and supports of Hong Kong people. Yes or No?

Lik

成日淨係識得問我，又唔見你回應一吓我問你嘅問題？不過唔緊要，你賤架都唔係淨係今日先開始，而我亦無諗過你會唔賤。

50幾分鐘嘅片，你可以響幾分鐘之內睇完？你係超人定係識得 time warp呀，老細？咪玩啦～

每一個政客都需要得到人民嘅支持，毓民同大舊亦唔例外。問題係，即使事實擺在眼前，好似你同Peter呢挺刷鞋狗又會聽咩？全世界都知道趙連海同劉曉波係無罪，又唔見中共法院判佢地無罪釋放？

同你講野簡直徙我時間。

-力

rockypath

50幾分鐘嘅片，你可以響幾分鐘之內睇完？你係超人定係識得 time warp呀，老細？咪玩啦～

每一個政客都需要得到人民嘅支持，毓民同大舊亦唔例外。問題係，即使事實擺在眼前，好似你同Peter呢挺刷鞋狗又會聽咩？全世界都知道趙連海同劉曉波係無罪，又唔見中共法院判佢地無罪釋放？
Lik 發表於 2011-1-26 13:13

你識唔識人話？ What made you fall into the imagination that I only realized the existence of the those clips on web and watched them after you told me even though I had repeatedly told you that that you are not the only source of information?
   
It will be my problem whether to admit and accept a fact and truth when it is presented in front of me.

Your problem is that your definition of truth and fact depending on your personal and biased preference. If it agrees with and supports your viewpoints, you would accept it as a fact and truth even though it may not be the truth or fact. Otherwise, sorry.

Lik

你老吹又好，夠薑就又好，係之前有睇晒大舊講乜野嘅話，你咪認咗佢囉，反正又無人能夠證明你有無睇過。你不如話埋俾我聽你當時就響立法會到現場聽大舊講野～

不過如果你係之前就經已一早睇晒嘅話，咁你最初串佢地嘅時候就唔係空空洞洞咁無的放矢啦～

係舢舨就咪能出來同我充炮艇，唔係跌落大海餵鯊魚就唔係幾好啦～

-力

rockypath

你老吹又好，夠薑就又好，係之前有睇晒大舊講乜野嘅話，你咪認咗佢囉，反正又無人能夠證明你有無睇過。你不 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-26 18:05

You have not answered my question - how can you be so sure what they said is the truth and fact? Do you have the gut to answer directly instead of avoiding it? Are you personally involved in the process and knowing all the details and facts?

You once again reconfirm what I said about you - your definition of truth and facts depending on your own personal and biased preference.

kingkong123

mad dog wong and 大舊 are cowards.
peter236 發表於 2011-1-26 12:33

    为民请命，叫coward？ 甘你米连coward 都不如？？

ricrick

很多民主派成員就是因黨而就犯，背信棄義
毓民同大舊就係吾會因為個黨來左右自己的理念
所信所為一直沒有改變，旗幟鮮明，貫切如一，我100%支持!