mcjohnjohn

原帖由 大C姐 於 2008-11-26 14:02 發表
所以我覺得佢哋都好節制。

我唔會好似樓上D人用"社會包袱"呀﹐咩"父母負擔"入呢D位。因為我都細過﹐索K食草﹐呢D真係人生必經階段。就算自己唔敢食﹐身邊都總有幾個。所以我唔會好虛偽咁用好既高道德標準去judge呢班o靚仔﹐因為我好明呢D係好奇心態人人都有。

當然我係唔鼓勵﹐我再次強調。但係都唔算出事﹐只係俾人踢爆姐。

-- 夜生活女王

索K食草﹐呢D係妳人生經過既階段only, 小弟從來都冇經過過呢一d 所謂既必經階段.
雖然小弟冇索K食草, 但亦都唔會好虛偽咁用好既高道德標準去judge呢班o靚仔, 只係覺得佢地如果可以比d 心機讀書會好d.
仲有, 如果販毒及吸毒都唔算出事既話, 係唔係殺人放火先至叫做出事?

shutterbug

由細到大完全無唸過要吸毒, 食煙都無

因為覺得做呢Ｄ野好stupid

放縱同節制都攪唔清...

CWong

原帖由 大C姐 於 25/11/2008 22:02 發表



所以我覺得佢哋都好節制。

我唔會好似樓上D人用"社會包袱"呀﹐咩"父母負擔"入呢D位。因為我都細過﹐索K食草﹐呢D真係人生必經階段。就算自己唔敢食﹐身邊都總有幾個。所以我唔會好虛偽咁用好既高道德標準去judge呢班o靚 ...

唉吔，你抬到我咁清高，講到自己咁折墮，我真係受唔起，好彩你係Ｃ姐，唔係師姐！

utopia

原帖由 大C姐 於 2008-11-25 23:02 發表



所以我覺得佢哋都好節制。

我唔會好似樓上D人用"社會包袱"呀﹐咩"父母負擔"入呢D位。因為我都細過﹐索K食草﹐呢D真係人生必經階段。就算自己唔敢食﹐身邊都總有幾個。所以我唔會好虛偽咁用好既高道德標準去judge呢班o靚 ...

I agree with you. Dai C jei. "因為我都細過﹐索K食草﹐呢D真係人生必經階段。就算自己唔敢食﹐身邊都總有幾個"

I personally never touch drug but I don't think this group is as bad as the news describe... Especially after I read their 9 rules =)


At least they ain't group raping a girl and taped it like the fast food chain news la...

utopia

Btw, why "not lying" is part of the rule?

siumaibb

大C姐，你同班靚仔好熟？你又知佢地係好奇試下？如果佢地係上左癮，一日要吸幾次先得咁點算？佢亞爸亞媽做小販咋，我相信都唔會俾好多錢佢啦，無錢點算？男既咪去偷去搶囉，你架車有無俾人break in過呀？我就有啦。女既點算？咪幫人走粉，跟手俾人賣落火坑囉。賣淫為吸毒，你話值唔值？

吸毒本身可能唔係一個大問題，但係吸毒帶黎既問題就係好大問題，大C姐，你可能受過高等教育識自我節制，但係好多人都唔得架，吸毒係一個坑，挖得太深你就會發覺岩岩好夠你訓落去架啦

Hyde

K is not addictive

utopia

BTW, I dun think Dai C jei is = Lik

Because I remember Lik is a teacher and Dai C Jei seems to work Public relation or HR.

Unless Lik changed job la

shutterbug

原帖由 Hyde 於 2008-11-26 12:46 發表
K is not addictive

So?

It doesn't mean it won't do brain damage.

Hyde

原帖由 utopia 於 2008-11-26 12:59 發表
BTW, I dun think Dai C jei is = Lik

Because I remember Lik is a teacher and Dai C Jei seems to work Public relation or HR.

Unless Lik changed job la

ppl with multiple personality can act and become very different