返回列表 發帖
回復 9# rainbow-davie

三不政策 should be 不承諾, 不拒絕, 不負責任...

TOP

nono.. it is 面對公眾既四不一沒有: 不承諾, 不拒絕, 不承擔, 不回應, 沒有共識

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-7-17 23:21 編輯

回復 10# rockypath

10 years may be the best after compromising with CCP... I understand what Lik's anger, but to be honest, HK has wasted too much valuable time on some minor political talks. It's time to be practical to move forward... 人生有幾多個十年??

But the first criteria is, there ought to be a time frame with solid promise. I don't want another generation gets ruined again, they should have a better HK dream... Let them see hope, not just dreaming...

The spirit of HK (creativity, freedom insist, harmony), shall return, and shine...

TOP

回復 12# rainbow-davie

Oops... Mine should be good to a playboy...

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-7-18 00:23 編輯
回復  rockypath

10 years may be the best after compromising with CCP... I understand what Lik's an ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-7-17 23:06


To me, general election is not an pressing issue compare to affordable housing . I can wait for another additional 10 years to exchange for the problem of affordable housing can be resolved and  HK can established other high value industries so that the average income level of HK people can be increased.

TOP

If I am 特首, 係咁既制度, 權力係由北京授權, 出糧係市民, 立法會泛民唔可以親近(因阿爺唔LIKE), 建制隨時 ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2011-7-17 22:48

你呢個做法,其實同當奴完全無分別,一樣幫唔到香港人。講得好聽就係社會和諧,講得唔好聽,就係縮骨兼乜撚正經野都唔做。

一開始我就已經講,特首要做任何憲法、政制嘅事其實都無能力,因為做乜都要通過5步曲來等阿爺批完再批,而阿爺就一定唔會俾你香港搞自由民主野。阿爺一直嘅做法都係一路拖,一路不斷泵人來同化你,到時你就自己不攻自破。所以香港人(包括特首)最應該做嘅就係頂住阿爺,保住香港本土意識,再 inspire 內地,接辛亥革命之時「國家顛覆基地」嘅重任令到內地嘅民主自由意識深入民心。
#3)        The details of policies of increasing land supplies for affordable housing is beyond my capabilities of discussion. I don’t know what will work or will not work in Hong Kong.

即係響度狗up啦~
#4)        Ask yourself this question – does the failure of trying to developing new industries conclude it is a wrong idea or it is a right idea but was wrongly executed? Singapore has been taking this direction. Are they stupid? (btw, I am suspicious whether you are confused by the word – “industry”. Manufacturing is only a type of industries. Filming is also an industry, for example.)

老董當年當然係做得衰,而我當然知道工業並唔代表製造業,製造業只係其中一個 example。但實際上要搞新工業有好大難度。

講過好多次,香港嘅強項係智識型經濟,而且人工比鄰近地方貴,所以人工方面已經輸蝕咗一截。而且香港人整體搵錢嘅心態比較急功近利同短視,一心最想亦最鍾意搵快錢,長線嘅投資比較難做得成。呢樣野係香港人性格上嘅缺陷,本性嘅野好難改。

響西方世界,要拓展新工業其實通常都係靠人民自己嘅創意來 think out of the box,去做啲新嘅,以前無人做過嘅野。但香港人雖然話頭醒尾轉數快,而且創意唔係無,但就通常都用晒落去啲小聰明嘅事之上。但目前來講,就算你只係想租個舖來搞野,淨係交租都交死你。想去租工廈來搞咩?做咗少則三幾個月,長則一兩年,之後政府又走來搞你話要地區重建,趕走晒社區原本嘅人,起好新地方之後就只係益晒發展商。咁你新工業又去做屁咩?

就係咁,所以我先至話響香港要搞新工業難。人地新加坡個政府就真係強政勵治,重要識得吸晒啲精英入局去為國家做野喇~ 香港政府入面嘅精英?有料如毓民、民主余女神等等就俾人打壓同設局來牽制,而本來回歸前全世界最有效率嘅公務員班子就經過15年嘅催殘而搞到得返個英年早逝條條Fing之流來領導,咁又有乜鬼野精英?有都去咗自己搵水啦?仲要幫你政府搞工業喎?

-力

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-7-18 00:41 編輯

回復 16# Lik

Instead of 即係響度狗up, do some research first, shameless mad dog.

Do you know what Singapore is doing? Find it out first instead of 響度狗up.

If you continue madly barking, you just keep embarrassing and disgracing yourself publicly in front of LYKs. I don't think people will welcome or appreciate you continue ruining a meaningful discussion.


hmmmm........, maybe I should change my mind to support banning you this mad dog.

TOP

回復 16# Lik

"你呢個做法,其實同當奴完全無分別,一樣幫唔到香港人。 .... "


係架. 呢個制度下, 既然無可能有改變, 幫唔到大眾, 咪要幫自己. 仲要同自己講, 如果俾著其他人, 會更差. 我算好架啦.

我既倣法比無目標既打好呢份工, 搞親疏布別 更加有清晰既目標及長短期做法.


所以, 要改變唯有革命, 但標題係"做特首", 咁身為特首無可能革自己架麻. 唔通帶領香港革阿爺條命咩..  諗下,都係出路. 反正香港以前都係輸出革命.

如果有個標題係"做革命特首" 時, 再講啦.

TOP

回復 16# Lik

Shameless idiot mad dog Lik,

Did you find out what Singapore has been doing?  Show us what you found.  

TOP

回復  Lik

Shameless idiot mad dog Lik,

Did you find out what Singapore has been doing?  Show us  ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-18 10:38

仆街,

例子係你指出來嘅。點解要我幫你做埋功課?

餐餐都係咁,無啲長進~

-力

TOP

返回列表