chunsh

原帖由 soli 於 2008-11-24 15:34 發表
還有﹐我要投訴daimo上面post 對我所作出的人身攻擊﹐他臆測我留言動機。

yeah, based on yahoo knowledge

troll指專事在internet的留言板或討論區, 用挑撥性的字眼或攻擊性的言論針對某位發言者作情緒上的騷擾, 而非針對主題或其發言內容作評論的匿名者, 而這種行為則稱為trolling, 其動機既是以煽風點火(flaming) 為樂, 則必需要有人回應甚至群情激憤才會令其稱心愉快

I dont see how did soli want to start a fire by saying his opinions about 娼妓

who is the troll?

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2008-11-25 06:33 發表
how?

and u know without them, how many rapists will appear in our society

any statistic provided?

mcjohnjohn

小弟都覺得娼妓合法化係可以. 將住香港既娼妓搬哂o係一個小區入面(唔可以離開呢一個區域做生意), 而顧客就一定要去呢一個地方幫襯. o係呢個地區既出入口加裝CCTV, 記錄低出入既資料, 登記顧客既個人身份可以保障妓女既安全.

chunsh

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-11-24 18:20 發表


any statistic provided?

face the truth, men have lust, and their own hands can't always satisfy themselves. If no prostitute, where / how do they release their protein and lust. Don't tell me god can, as human lust are "by-design".

also, any statistic provided that the legalize (I dont know if there is such word) of prostitute will ruin our next generation?

chunsh

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-11-24 18:26 發表
小弟都覺得娼妓合法化係可以. 將住香港既娼妓搬哂o係一個小區入面(唔可以離開呢一個區域做生意), 而顧客就一定要去呢一個地方幫襯. o係呢個地區既出入口加裝CCTV, 記錄低出入既資料, 登記顧客既個人身份可以保障妓女 ...

agree with the first half, "將住香港既娼妓搬哂o係一個小區入面"
but totally not disagree with the later part
who would like to go there if your information will be recorded? no customers for the prostitutes mean no foods; and they turn out to go outside and operate their business in some other private places to attract more customers---> back to no change

mcjohnjohn

我覺得為左保障妓女既安全, 絕對有需要記錄顧客資料!
其實除左記錄資料之外, 都應該要派人去定時拍一拍房門, 咁樣可以保證妓女既生命安全.

當然, 為左怕d 妓女冇得撈, 政府都應該考慮o係娼妓小區入面開一d 再陪瞓課程比d 妓女, 請專人教授唔同既床技, 令妓女既謀生本錢更高! 除左再陪瞓, 都要開再陪訓班(如家務助理課程)比一d 真係因為冇生意而有意從良既妓女, 令到佢地有生存空間.

如果佢地冇生意既出去其他地方, 我覺得就要捉佢地, 因為佢地犯左法, 因為娼妓合法化之後, 娼妓只能o係特定地方進行性交易.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2008-11-25 09:28 發表
face the truth, men have lust, and their own hands can't always satisfy themselves. If no prostitute, where / how do they release their protein and lust. Don't tell me god can, as human lust are "by-design".

also, any statistic provided that the legalize (I dont know if there is such word) of prostitute will ruin our next generation?

I don't have statistic, so I never say that prostitute will ruin our next generation.
I just thought that you must have statistic to back you up when you said that. sorry to hear that you just relied on lust. hoho.

chunsh

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-11-24 19:42 發表
我覺得為左保障妓女既安全, 絕對有需要記錄顧客資料!
其實除左記錄資料之外, 都應該要派人去定時拍一拍房門, 咁樣可以保證妓女既生命安全.

當然, 為左怕d 妓女冇得撈, 政府都應該考慮o係娼妓小區入面開一d 再陪瞓課 ...

that just would not help the situation
your opinion about the is like some HKSAR top level of government people who are trying to help the some group of poor people but always set the polices to help the wrong way

chunsh

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-11-24 19:44 發表


I don't have statistic, so I never say that prostitute will ruin our next generation.
I just thought that you must have statistic to back you up when you said that. sorry to hear that you just relie ...

I didnt say I rely on lust, I just said that that the truth is, we are born with lust. and in order to prevent some people to put words into my mouth, I have clarify that we shouldnt control out lust. of course in order to live in human society, we have to control our lust so that we dont harm other people.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2008-11-25 10:49 發表
I didnt say I rely on lust, I just said that that the truth is, we are born with lust. and in order to prevent some people to put words into my mouth, I have clarify that we shouldnt control out lust. of course in order to live in human society, we have to control our lust so that we dont harm other people.

chunsh, I strongly agree that we have to control our lust so that we don't harm other people~