peter236

Moron,

Next time, do a little more research before your start spewing shxt from your mouth la~
...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-3 20:40

Like we discussed before, the low level incidents at Daya Bay were not required to be disclosed immediately according to international regulation, so the bashers should STFU, as there was no cover-ups at all.

We are still skeptical that India has mastered such technology just by looking at their lousy technological development. They can't even build their own nuclear power plant and the Indians do not even have stable electricity supply.

Still there is no mention that Canada or Germany have mastered this technology.

mcjohnjohn

Like we discussed before, the low level incidents at Daya Bay were not required to be disclosed im ...
peter236 發表於 2011-1-4 13:24

Peter 仔, 仲乜你成日都mention 印度野架?!?!
係唔係近排溝左件好索既印度西施?

kingkong123

Like we discussed before, the low level incidents at Daya Bay were not required to be disclosed im ...
peter236 發表於 2011-1-3 21:24

    核泄漏大细，系人都应该有知情权啊。（according to international regulation）三聚氰胺分量少，细路吃有事，大人吃没事，就没所谓？

MoiRhapsody

Germany is stepping out of Nuclear power and Canada never really depends on nuclear power anyways.

mcjohnjohn

Germany is stepping out of Nuclear power and Canada never really depends on nuclear power anyways.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-1-4 15:54

其實理論上核電真係唔錯架wor. 點解佢地唔o係呢方面發展呢?

MoiRhapsody

加拿大有大量水力資源。
德國主要原因係國民對核廢料處理出現既問題非常反感。
德國五十年代已經用核發電，用左超過半個世紀，
2000年話會逐步關閉核電廠，2020年會完全0核。

mcjohnjohn

加拿大有大量水力資源。
德國主要原因係國民對核廢料處理出現既問題非常反感。
德國五十年代已經用核發電， ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-1-4 16:17

水力資源? 加拿大係唔係好似大陸既三峽大霸咁發電? 定係有其他更好既方法?
小弟真係覺得核電係好野, 希望d 科學家可以多d 研究. E = mc2 實在太吸引, 太迷人了~

zoids

水力資源? 加拿大係唔係好似大陸既三峽大霸咁發電? 定係有其他更好既方法?
小弟真係覺得核電係好野, 希望d ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-1-4 01:05

Most if not all Ontario and Quebec have been using nuclear energy for long time, also Canada is one of the top uranium producer if I remember it right.  

The article looks flawless until you ask more about details and follow uranium news.

First, it's well known that China is building a lot of nuclear generators, and just signed a long term contract with Cameco, if this technology is ready to be used, they won't need any more uranium already as the article mentioned.

Same for Russia, if the reprocess technology is really commercially viable, why Russia just spent all these money to buy Uranium One and Mantra mine in Africa?  They obviously is going all out to secure any uranium source.

Then you look at the uranium spot price, it just gone up 50% from $40 in last June to now $62 and still going up.  Look at uranium companies like URRE, the stock price just jumped from $1 to $3.5 in a few months.  Don't you think something is very fishy going on?

I think everyone is jumping on the uranium bandwagon, I think PRC is trying to make the uranium spot price lower by understating their demand to get their uranium as cheap as possible before uranium spot price back to record $130 like in 2007.

Last time it was a bubble, this time everyone is building nuclear plants... do you think this will another bubble too?  I think it will eventually turn into another bubble, but not now.

I forgot someone mentioned UUU long time ago, thank to that guy, I realized the coming demand and made a bit profit from the recent global uranium renaissance.

peter236

Most if not all Ontario and Quebec have been using nuclear energy for long time, also Canada is on ...
zoids 發表於 2011-1-4 01:59

I was thinking the same thing, why is uranium prices going up if these countries can recycle uranium. For India cannot even build their own nuclear power plant, how can they master the technique to recycle uranium to generate power?