返回列表 發帖
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2010-11-29 22:29 編輯

回復 8# kingkong123

Obviously you know nothing about the importance of Korean War impact to the modern China, as well as the world...

Mao has made a correct (but not necessarily good) "political" judgement at that time frame.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-11-30 00:19 編輯
回復  kingkong123

Obviously you know nothing about the importance of Korean War impact to the mode ...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-11-29 22:26


The moron he has no clue of Chinese history. He just knows bashing China.

TOP

本帖最後由 kingkong123 於 2010-11-30 00:16 編輯

回復 12# lo_pak


    Obviously you know you know nothing about 共产党和中国的历史

之前的朝鲜战争是朝鲜在不自量力的情况下侵略韩国在前,毛贼急于输出革命为后

所为的抗美援朝,保卫国防只是一贯共产党用于战争的借口

系咯喔,美国佬要打你中国使唔使花甘多力气先打朝鲜再进入你中国打你甘猪兜啊? 直接打你福建,已经足够无需话甘多力气搞朝鲜再进入中国。 事实胜于雄辩,到了最后中共都是成人自己参加朝鲜战争是个极大的错误。 问问当年打过朝鲜战争的军人就知道,他们回来的待遇是什么? 朝鲜战争回来的人没有一个给予英雄式的待遇。 每个都穷困潦倒

死在朝鲜的军人,死后的待遇是什么? 被埋在朝鲜的中国志愿军人,在朝鲜战争后被朝鲜人从地里挖出来抛尸

TOP

The US also do these kinda things... LOL.
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2010-11-29 21:20


yeah, that's true.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-11-30 00:18 編輯
The problem here is that "who will be the ally of Korea, if it is united."

US wants the Whole Korea ...
Prelude 發表於 2010-11-29 18:29


China is now the largest export markets for both Korea and Japan.
But Japan is the common of enemy of both China and Korea. In the past 150 years, Japan had used Korea numerous times as a springboard to attack China. Both Chinese and Korean are still suspicious of Japanese militarism.

A new unified Korea will challenge Japanese industries. So Japan has the most to lose. China is too big for Korea to pose a challenge. Imagine the Korean companies like Samsung and Hyundai setting up factories in low cost North Korea, they will be a big challenge for Japanese industries which are already losing market share to the Koreans. It is Japan that is worried about a unified Korea.

TOP

回復 10# BiscottiGelato


    甘就唔同讲法拉, 你细心念念

美国在韩战后得到唔少经济上的好处,反而中国在朝鲜战争得到的系什么?

每年中国用纳税人的钱供养朝鲜,供养朝鲜高官的奢华花费, 知道现在中国还是用钱供养朝鲜,宁愿让千千万万的中国儿童挨饿,没书读,也要贴钱给朝鲜高官,中国的唔好好处哦,死左的中国军人在朝鲜连安葬的地方都没,最后给朝鲜人挖出来给野狗啃骨头, 你话了,边个做左蠢事?

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2010-11-30 00:43 編輯

回復 14# kingkong123

打福建, ...

Very disappointed you haven't studied Cold War in good depth...

I agree that China has been betrayed by companions Russia and North Korea past the war. Short after the war, China has gone through a crazy era of the cultural revolution. However, since then, there's no more major warfares associated with China for couple decades...

TOP

回復 18# lo_pak


    死鸡撑饭盖没用啊,事实胜于雄辩

对于一个没有在大陆生活过,学习过的人来讲,有你甘的思想,唔奇怪

TOP

回復  BiscottiGelato


    甘就唔同讲法拉, 你细心念念
美国在韩战后得到唔少经济上的好处,反而中国在朝鲜战争得到的系什么?

kingkong123 發表於 2010-11-30 00:22


You should think again here. The US spends large amount of money to maintain the military bases in Korea and Japan.

China has used North Korea as a leverage or a bargaining chip against the US. The US needs China's cooperation with regard to North Korea. China can then asks the US to shutup about China currency and other trade issues.

TOP

返回列表