返回列表 發帖
Not sure why people say prime lenses are impractical.  After I've made the switch to only shoot prime, I have not had a moment when I wished I had a zoom.

TOP

Prime shot quality is better than zoom lens...

TOP

Prime shot quality is better than zoom lens...
lo_pak 發表於 2011/1/1 12:59


it's not just about the quality
a prime weighs less than a zoom and by walking forward and backward, it really frees up your mind

TOP

People always recommend others to buy a 50mm prime lense. However, the advice is only well placed if ...
Lik 發表於 2011-1-1 12:01


err....
totally not recommending these lenses
especially the 18-135 and 18-200.........

TOP

err....
totally not recommending these lenses
especially the 18-135 and 18-200.........
嘉嘉 發表於 2011/1/1 13:50


having a superzoom on the camera all the time pretty much defeats the purpose of having an interchangeable system

TOP

err....
totally not recommending these lenses
especially the 18-135 and 18-200.........
嘉嘉 發表於 2011-1-1 13:50
why???

TOP

having a superzoom on the camera all the time pretty much defeats the purpose of having an interch ...
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-1 13:56


yes........

TOP

If prime lens beat zoom lens in all situations, the manufacturers wouldn't have made zoom lens; and the other way round too. It's not either of them is better in all ways, but they fit into different purpose and situations. Gotta understand the features of different products and know your own need and evaluate which lens(es) suits you the most before buying blindly.

TOP

why???
sky 發表於 2011-1-1 14:16


個range係cover哂大部份日常影o既o野
但IQ兩頭唔到岸
and why DSLR if the person is sticking with the same lens forever...

TOP

It all comes down to how you intend to use the camera, and how much you're willing to shell out for that usage. There are tons of people who don't care about switching lenses at all -- that is why general purpose walkaround lenses such as 15-85, 17-85, 18-135, and 18-200 are made (and more importantly, why they are so popular). At the same time, not everyone care about absolute image quality. If they do, the only lenses Canon would see are 17-55 F/2.8 IS and the various L-lenses.

Realistically and specifically, how much is the OP looking to spend? If purchased locally, even the 18-135 is a ~$600+tax lens. The 18-200 is ~$750+tax, and the 15-85 is ~$1000. They are cheaper if you buy from the States (BH Photo is a good place), but at the end of the day, lenses are NOT cheap.

Also, how many lenses and how much gear do you want to bring when you head out? If you intend to haul your LowePro backpack with full gear every single time you shoot, more power to you and I admire your dedication. The majority of casual photographers that I know, however, only wants to carry the minimal amount of stuff.

-Lik

TOP

返回列表