Littleprince

也同加拿大某D人所想不謀而合窩。。。不是說讓大麻合法化咪唔使怕D人繼續因大麻而犯法的嗎﹖ 是誰說的﹖ 我忘記了。。。總之有D人諗野。。。真係好“得”

Littleprince

well, same thing in here too about legalizing drugs
shutterbug 發表於 2009-12-10 14:03

GIVE ME 5 。。。我地同時說了同樣的話啊

Littleprince

7# sheep


係喇係喇﹐殺人放火全部 LEGALIZED 更好﹐想做乜都可以做﹐兼無人犯法﹐天下太平﹐真好啊。。。

Littleprince

Really?  I only know Japanese are 咸湿 lor...
shutterbug 發表於 2009-12-10 15:50

all male human beings are...

Littleprince

合唔合法都係會滾，
要咁講，飲酒都要禁，因為醉都唔夠high,一定要吸下毒先夠喉，根本係無限上綱。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-12-10 22:43

好提議呀﹐一於禁~~

Littleprince

人類最初點解需要法律﹖ 如果人人都達到最高道德標準 (愛人如己) 就不用 (因為既然愛人如己就不會殺人﹐不會偷盜﹐等等)﹐可是﹐因為人係自私的﹐他們都會偷隔離屋的雞﹐隔離屋的錢﹐會殺隔離屋只狗﹐ETC。ETC。法律先至有需要﹐從而慢慢形成﹐所以殺了隔離屋只狗的懲罰與殺了隔離屋個老婆係不一樣的。。。

假如人人都嫖妓所以嫖妓應該合法化﹐某程度上無問題。。。但係當你無限上崗﹐話因為人人都愛殺人而放棄殺人需要接受懲罰﹐這就會有很大的問題。。。道德標準無錯係不斷下降﹐但觀乎人類社會﹐當去到最低就會有人出來拉番高DD﹐這一切都是循環﹐否則現今我們都唔存在了﹐以往都曾發生過無數次大屠殺﹐若因此而制定法律話殺人無罪﹐我和你的祖先都早早就死去了。。。

Littleprince

u drink wine for taste not representing other people would be the same with u also
some people just like showing off their drinking skills (can drink alot without getting drunk) by drink alot and sti ...
chunsh 發表於 2009-12-11 11:02

just like somebody takes some weeds or drink wines before driving a plane (747) to show how brave they are and you agreed with this and don't think it should be stopped?

Littleprince

speeding都係唔應該，對其他道路使用者構成危險，不過如何介定speeding就有商確如地。 ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-12-11 10:51

x2

Littleprince

just because it's legalized....it doesn't mean one has to do it...it's one's choice to choose what, how often and how much one wants to do it
just like your wine example...it's your own decision on ho ...
news 發表於 2009-12-11 11:55

不知你家中有無細路仔呢﹖假如你告訴你個仔﹐你可以隨便吃家中任何東西﹐包括你的藥和煙﹐你猜你 5 歲的仔仔會不會拿來試試呢﹖雖說是自由選擇﹐但對於不懂分是非的細路來說﹐準代表可以做﹐代表做左唔會受罰﹐他們就會去試。。。相反若你說﹐仔仔﹐你甚麼都可以食﹐但不要碰我的煙和藥。。。 他就算做都只敢偷偷做﹐做了也怕被罵。。。而我細個係乖細路﹐爸爸說了不准碰的﹐我真的完全沒有碰過。。。

當然﹐就算法例禁止﹐也還有好多人做﹐就像上面乖同曳細路的例子一樣。

Littleprince

不要告訴我加拿大人個個都識分是非黑白﹐係就早已天下太平