返回列表 發帖
有D野係本質上有極大分別. 就係三權分立再加人權.
加拿大執法者執法錯誤, 受害人可以依法律方面還個清明同賠償. 政府唔會政治干預司法. 執法都唔可以.
呢d 要睇明睇清, 唔好一下子民粹上腦.

仲想辯駁, 我簡單問你地一句. 如果你犯左事或被懷疑犯事,你會認為邊個國家會俾你一個公平既審訊

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-9-4 16:32 編輯

我對香港的司法的信心絕對要比加拿大的司法高。

我對香港警察的質素的信心絕對要比加拿大警察的質素高。

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-9-4 16:36 編輯
Always say law enforcement here just serves their ego. Even more dangerous and unreasonable than HK/Mainland law enforcement, which acts out of political motives as ordered from their seniors/bosses. At least you know you can avoid situations in HK/China by avoiding political sensitive issues, which majority of the citizens won't get into anyways.

Here you can be power tripped by doing almost anything. In terms of sense of security for honest citizens in dealing with authorities, it's much superior in HK and China vs here.

Accountability and EQ is much lacking here for law enforcement in North America in general.
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-9-4 14:37

Totally agree with you here. Just waiting for Mr Lik's response.

TOP

哈哈﹐加拿大警察用電槍電死無辜既人﹐再夾口供妨礙司法公正﹐兩條大罪﹐最後咪又係乜事都無。
講咩司法呀。

TOP

英語不好????

He has been in canada since 1977  ??
34 years in canada and he is still not good in simple english to explain??
First law: Every body remains in a state of rest or uniform motion unless it is acted upon by an external unbalanced force.

TOP

我對香港的司法的信心絕對要比加拿大的司法高。

我對香港警察的質素的信心絕對要比加拿大警察的質素高。 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-9-4 16:29

对中国的公安又有什么意见?

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

对中国的公安又有什么意见?
老友四號 發表於 2011-9-4 17:10


我對亞洲的警察最有信心的是香港、新加坡和日本。中國的公安肯定進不了前三,但也決不是最後三名。

這是否回答了你的問題?

TOP

回復 18# rockypath
回答了。雖然並不十分認同。

在此謝過。

TOP

回復  rockypath
回答了。雖然並不十分認同。

在此謝過。
老友四號 發表於 2011-9-4 18:24


請問在你看來亞洲國家之中排在前三名的是哪三個國家的警察? 中國公安在亞洲是否排在最後三名?

TOP

返回列表