返回列表 發帖

西安殺人滅口大學生遭處決

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/inews/20110607/ca21315p.htm

西安殺人滅口大學生遭處決 (13:15)



經最高人民法院核准,撞車後殺人滅口的西安大學生藥家鑫,今日在陜西省西安市被依法執行死刑。

2011年4月22日,陜西省西安市中級人民法院以故意殺人罪判處被告人藥家鑫死刑,剝奪政治權利終身。

宣判後,藥家鑫提出上訴。陜西省人民檢察院認為該案事實清楚,證據充分,建議二審駁回上訴,維持原判。

陜西省高級人民法院經依法審理,於5月20日依法作出裁定,駁回藥家鑫上訴,維持原判,並依法報請最高人民法院核準。

最高人民法院經覆核認為,被告人藥家鑫開車撞倒被害人張妙後,又持刀將張妙殺死,其行為構成故意殺人罪。藥家鑫僅因交通肇事將被害人撞倒後,為逃避責任殺人滅口,持尖刀朝被害人胸、腹、背部等處連續捅刺數刀,將被害人當場殺死,其犯罪動機極其卑劣,手段特別殘忍,情節特別惡劣,後果特別嚴重,屬罪行極其嚴重。

2010年10月20日晚,西安音樂學院大三學生、21歲的藥家鑫駕駛紅色雪佛蘭小轎車行駛到西北大學長安校區西圍牆外時,撞上前方同向騎電動車的張妙,藥家鑫下車查看,發現張妙倒地呻吟,因怕張妙看到其車牌號,以後找麻煩,便產生殺人滅口的念頭,遂從隨身背包中取出一把尖刀,上前對倒地的被害人張妙連捅6刀,致張妙當場死亡。

殺人後,藥家鑫駕車逃離現場,車行至翰林路郭南村口時再次將兩行人撞傷,後交警大隊郭杜中隊將肇事車輛暫扣待處理。

法院指出,藥家鑫在作案後第四天由其父母帶領到公安機關投案,如實供述犯罪事實,構成自首,但不足以從輕處罰。

第一審判決、第二審裁定認定的事實清楚,證據確實、充分,定罪準確,量刑適當,審判程序合法,故依法作出核准死刑的裁定。

西安市中級人民法院今日上午在宣告上述裁定後,對藥家鑫執行了死刑。

呢單案本身,罪有應得,無野好講。

但假如我地睇吓同類嘅案件,如果罪犯個阿爸係稍有權位,咁又會如何呢?我爸是李剛一案當中嘅李啓銘同樣車死人(仲傷多咗一個添),大家又記唔記得佢判咗咩刑呢?

-力

TOP

我爸是李剛一案當中嘅李啓銘同樣車死人(仲傷多咗一個添),大家又記唔記得佢判咗咩刑呢?

Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 11:27



    I dont know wor ... what kind??

TOP

呢單案本身,罪有應得,無野好講。

但假如我地睇吓同類嘅案件,如果罪犯個阿爸係稍有權位,咁又會如何呢? ...
Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 11:27

〔(權位+金錢+特權)+屈法〕=現今新中國。

TOP

李剛之子醉駕撞人獲刑6年 積極賠償成輕判理由
2011-01-31 人民網

1月25日,在河北省望都縣人民法院門口張貼的公告。 新華社發曾經引起社會廣泛關注的河北大學“1016”校園車禍案30日一審宣判,河北省望都縣人民法院認定李啟銘醉酒駕駛,致1人死亡1人受傷,且肇事後逃逸,構成交通肇事罪。李啟銘被判處有期徒刑6年。

2010年10月16日晚,李啟銘酒後駕車到河北大學新校區生活區,將兩名女生撞倒後被保安和學生扣留。警方經對李啟銘採血並對所駕車輛進行檢測,鑒定為醉酒超速駕駛。其中一名傷者陳曉鳳因搶救無效死亡。

案發後,李啟銘家屬對受害者家屬積極賠償,賠償死者陳曉鳳46萬元,傷者張晶晶9.1萬元,取得對方諒解。法庭鑒于李啟銘認罪態度較好,其親屬積極賠償被害人損失,酌情從輕處罰。

此案于2011年1月26日在河北省望都縣人民法院公開開庭審理。望都縣人民檢察院以交通肇事罪起訴李啟銘,列舉了相關犯罪事實。李啟銘當庭認罪,對犯罪事實供認不諱。

望都縣人民法院30日以交通肇事罪判處犯罪嫌疑人李啟銘有期徒刑6年。李啟銘對判決沒有發表意見。

■量刑答疑

問題1 為什麼不以“以危險方法危害公共安全罪”定罪

針對有關為什麼有的人醉酒駕車致人傷亡構成以危險方法危害公共安全罪,而李啟銘醉酒駕車致人死亡只以交通肇事罪定罪的提問,望都縣人民法院書面答複如下:

1.並非所有醉駕致人傷亡的犯罪,都一律以“以危險方法危害公共安全罪”定罪

以危險方法危害公共安全罪是指故意使用放火、決水、爆炸、投放危險物質以外的其他危險方法危害公共安全的行為;交通肇事罪是指違反交通運輸管理法規,因而發生重大交通事故,致人重傷、死亡或使公私財產遭受重大損失的行為。醉酒駕車是一種危害公共安全的危險行為,但並非所有醉酒駕車造成人員傷亡的犯罪,都一律按照以“以危險方法危害公共安全罪”定罪處罰。

2.李啟銘犯罪屬于過度自信的過失,証據不能証明其對後果持希望或放任的態度

最高人民法院2009年印發了《關于醉酒駕車犯罪法律適用問題的意見》。即:行為人醉酒駕車“肇事後繼續駕車衝撞,造成重大傷亡,說明行為人主觀上對持續發生的危害結果持放任態度,具有危害公共安全的故意。對此類醉酒駕車造成重大傷亡的,應依法以‘以危險方法危害公共安全罪’定罪。”

本案中,被告人李啟銘違反交通法規醉酒駕車,在他人善意提醒其慢速行駛時,過于相信自己的駕駛技術,稱“沒事”,輕信能夠避免危害後果的發生,屬于過度自信的過失。現有証據不能証明李啟銘對其駕車撞倒被害人陳曉鳳、張晶晶的結果持希望或者放任的態度。李啟銘肇事後,亦無出于逃逸等目的,不顧道路上行駛的其他車輛及行人安全,繼續駕車衝撞,造成更為嚴重後果的行為。因此,李啟銘的行為不符合上述《意見》規定的構成以危險方法危害公共安全罪的情形,對其行為應認定為交通肇事罪。

問題2 判處李啟銘有期徒刑6年的量刑依據是什麼

針對有關李啟銘判處有期徒刑6年量刑依據的問題,望都縣人民法院書面答複如下:

量刑首先要符合法律規定,其次要符合寬嚴相濟刑事政策,同時考慮被告人的從寬和從嚴處罰情節,在法定量刑範圍內,慎重穩妥地作出決定。《中華人民共和國刑法》第133條規定,交通肇事後逃逸的,應當判處3年以上7年以下有期徒刑。

雖然李啟銘親屬積極代為賠償被害人經濟損失,取得被害方的諒解,且其當庭自願認罪,悔罪態度較好,具有酌定從輕處罰的幅度,但李啟銘醉酒駕車、超速行駛,在校園內發生交通事故,致1人死亡1人受傷,且肇事後逃逸,犯罪情節惡劣,後果嚴重,應依法嚴懲。一審法院綜合考慮本案的具體情節,判處李啟銘有期徒刑6年,量刑適當。

■庭審現場

>>開庭 旁聽席座無虛席

26日上午9時整,經由河北省保定市司法機關指定,河北大學“1016”校園交通肇事案在望都縣人民法院第五審判庭公開開庭審理。

能容納60人的審判庭旁聽席座無虛席,旁聽人員有駐地人大代表和政協委員、新聞媒體記者、被害人家屬、被告人家屬、河北大學師生代表及部分群眾。

審判長宣布開庭後,李啟銘被兩名法警帶入法庭,坐到了法庭正中央的被告人席上。

>>檢方 以交通肇事罪起訴

作為公訴人,望都縣人民檢察院以交通肇事罪起訴李啟銘,認為被告人在去年10月16日晚在河北大學新校區生活區駕車撞人導致1人死亡1人受傷,後經警方鑒定其為醉酒駕駛,且在肇事後有逃逸行為,應負事故全部責任。希望法院以交通肇事罪判處被告人李啟銘3至7年的有期徒刑。

酒後駕車撞兩女生

公訴人隨後當庭出示了多組証據,包括李啟銘本人筆錄、目擊者証詞、河北大學校園監控錄像等,還原了李啟銘當天的犯罪事實:去年10月16日晚,李啟銘在保定市一家酒店請朋友吃飯,並喝了不少白酒,當時共有9人在場。飯後,李啟銘駕駛一輛黑色邁騰轎車送朋友回河北大學新校區生活區,當行駛至河大新校區生活區一家超市門前時,撞倒兩名女生。公訴人提供的証據還顯示,當時事發地點有明顯的警示牌“限速五公里”,但當時李啟銘沒有理會。

>>被告人 自稱發蒙當庭認罪

李啟銘在庭上辯稱,當時自己處于醉酒狀態,看到前面有人影,于是猛打方向盤拐彎並按喇叭,但還是沒有避開。事發後他繼續駕車行駛,“因為當時自己已經蒙了,不知道發生了什麼。”當他駕車返回河大新校區生活區南門時,大門已經關閉,保安和學生將他攔截,隨後他下車被保安帶到學校警衛室。

李啟銘當庭表示對公訴人的發言沒有異議,並說“我認罪。”

>>律師 認罪好望從輕判決

李啟銘的辯護律師張金龍對公訴人指控的犯罪事實及罪名沒有異議,但希望法院能考慮從輕判決。依據主要有,李啟銘認罪態度較好,筆錄顯示其在被保安扣留到學校警衛室後很著急地說:“趕緊打120,先救人,有什麼責任我全承擔。”事發後李啟銘及其家人積極主動對受害者家屬進行賠償,並達成了民事賠償協議,獲得了受害者家屬諒解。

TOP

但假如我地睇吓同類嘅案件,如果罪犯個阿爸係稍有權位,咁又會如何呢?我爸是李剛一案當中嘅李啓銘同樣車死人(仲傷多咗一個添),大家又記唔記得佢判咗咩刑呢?
Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 11:27


I am really sick of your BS.

這兩件案件是不同性質的案件,定罪當然會不同。你居然厚顏無恥顛倒黑白。 如果你是法官,我敢肯定你一定是個為所欲為的黑心法官。

TOP

本帖最後由 soli 於 2011-6-7 15:27 編輯

在加拿大﹐撞死警察﹐只需坐監兩年。

http://archive.richmond-news.com ... news/102104nn1.html

Ng's killer gets two years

By Darah Hansen

Only time will tell if a two-year-less-one-day jail sentence handed down to criminal driver Yau Chun "Stuart" Chan of Richmond Friday will make any impact on the Lower Mainland's deadly street-racing scene.

But the grieving parents of Const. Jimmy Ng - the Richmond police officer killed by Chan's speeding vehicle in September, 2002 - are hoping for the best.

"With (Chan) going to jail, that will send a message to other people who like to drive very (fast)," said Therese Ng, speaking to media outside B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver following Chan's sentencing hearing.

"Maybe they will have a second thought before they put their foot on the (gas) pedal. All you need is those few seconds for this to go through their minds. They may change (their minds) and some life may be saved."

But, she added, "It doesn't matter what kind of sentencing (is ordered). It's not going to bring Jimmy back. Our lives are ruined completely. We are serving our life sentence."

Earlier, Therese Ng and her husband, retired Richmond dentist Dr. Christopher Ng, watched as Chan, 21 - dressed in a dark suit and heavy black-framed glasses - was led off to prison cells by court sheriffs following the sentence imposed by Justice Groberman.

On Sept. 15, 2002, Chan ran a red light at the intersection of Williams and No. 3 roads in his speeding Honda sports car and T-boned Jimmy Ng's police cruiser . The force of the crash sent the 32-year-old constable through the back window of his vehicle, killing him instantly.

An injured Chan left the scene when his friend, Ying Hua "David" Guan, came to pick him up in a second car.

The two had been seen minutes before the crash speeding in two separate vehicles along Garden City Road.

And while a jail sentence was necessary to help deter others from committing the same crime, the sentencing judge said the penalty imposed on Chan should not be so onerous as to negatively impact the rest of his life.

"The accused is now a hardworking, productive member of society and he is highly remorseful," the judge said.

Chan was sentenced to two years less one day on the primary charge of criminal negligence causing death and a further six months on a charge of leaving the scene of the accident. (Chan pleaded guilty to both charges in June).

But the overall jail term was reduced to two years less one day after the judge agreed to consider the 21 days already spent in jail by Chan following his arrest, and the two years he spent on virtual "house arrest" while awaiting trial.

Chan was also ordered to serve two years on probation following his release from jail, and prohibited from driving for three years.

"Mr. Chan, I wish you the best of luck in the rest of your life. You have clearly learned a great deal from this tragic event," the judge said as the accused was led away.

Outside court, Christopher Ng said he and his wife were "really satisfied" with the sentence.

"It's better than we expected," Ng said. "And I think most of the public will understand and have the same feeling that this is appropriate."

But, he added, "This is not the end of it. This is just the beginning. ... We want the public to support us and ask your elected Member of Parliament to amend the Criminal Code. This is important when it's a matter of life and death involving criminal-driving behaviour."

Ng made the comments in relation to Bill C-453, introduced in the House of Commons last November by Conservative MP Randy White.

If passed, the bill would see a minimum jail sentence of seven years imposed on all first-time criminal drivers who kill or injure someone in the course of a street race, then flee the scene. Currently no such minimum exists in the Criminal Code.

Along with the Ngs, several police members from Richmond, including chief of police, Supt. Ward Clapham, packed the courtroom Friday.

Speaking for the detachment, Cpl. Peter Thiessen said officers are more determined than ever to put an end to street racing and other forms of criminal driving in the community.

"That's the only professional thing we can do," Thiessen said.

"Let's make no mistake about it," he added. "There are no winners. This is not about winning. This is about everyone losing. We lost Jimmy (Ng). The victim's family suffers. The RCMP suffers. The suspect is suffering. The suspect's family is suffering. Where in any of that is there anything positive?"

Thiessen said "only time will tell" whether the jail sentence imposed against Chan will help deter others from committing a similar crime.

Chan, himself, had nothing public to say Friday. He issued his apologies to the family at a sentencing hearing last month.

"I was really immature at the time," he said, through a Chinese-language interpreter.

Since the accident, Chan said he has grown up, has become a Christian and wants to "give back" to the community.

The Ng family said Friday that apology would have meant more if Chan had voluntarily asked to serve a jail sentence, rather than argue through his lawyer for a conditional sentence, which essentially amounts to probation.

Still, said Christopher Ng on Friday, Chan's apology was better than nothing -which is what the victim's family got from Chan's co-accused, David Guan of Richmond.

"Mr. Guan never did apologize to us," said Ng.


Guan was sentenced June 16 to three years probation and 240 hours of community work service for his part in helping his friend leave the scene.

TOP

同類嘅案件 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-6-7 11:27



殺人滅口 and "醉酒駕駛" + "事後逃逸" are 同類   ????

無野好講...

TOP

殺人滅口 and "醉酒駕駛" + "事後逃逸" are 同類   ????

無野好講...
daimo 發表於 2011-6-8 11:53

話唔定力兄知道一d 不可告人既祕密...
我爸是李剛話唔定都係殺人滅口, 只係我爸是李剛有權勢去掩飾呢一個真相...

TOP

殺人滅口 and "醉酒駕駛" + "事後逃逸" are 同類   ????

無野好講...
daimo 發表於 2011-6-7 19:53

唔完全同類,但相似嘅地方夠晒多:

1)官二代 vs 富二代
2)汽車撞人皆有死傷
3)肇事者均視人命如糞土
4)肇事者均以為可以凌駕於法律之上
5)發生時期極為相近(事情發生只相差四日)

-力

TOP

返回列表