我枉你仲夠膽講easing their burdens on housing, transportation。你個仆街政府儲備就多多，但政策就照樣無敵偏袒大地產商。公屋又唔肯起、地鐵、巴士、電力公司年年賺錢就年年加價，但又偏偏唔阻止。過海隧道亦一樣，不斷迫害廣大市民。你係咁多錢就收購返啲巴士公司同過海隧道啦～人地琛圳都買起咗條原本係私人嘅隧道來為民解困，等市民唔使捱貴隧道費喇～你香港政府食屎啦～
Lik, can you tell me how much the HKD 10,000 can change the situation of the poor? If th ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-23 15:09
Oh, and I should add that once again, you have avoided the questions I was asking you in post #9. Here they are again:
Given HK's already low tax rate, how would further lowering taxes or increasing tax exemption help the poor? The poor already doesn't have to pay any income taxes. When they are already paying nothing, how does giving them higher exemption amounts help? How?
I also see you purposely avoiding the topic of the SAR government putting money into 強積金. Please enlighten me with your infinite economics knowledge on who that move is helpful to the HK general public. It is a well-known and undisputed fact that management fees for 強積金 is way high, and that most people have lost money on the "investment". Now, let me ask you this -- who makes money on having higher 強積金 amounts? The investment firms, or regular Joe? Why is the SAR government willing to transfer this benefit to investment firms, but not to the citizens of HK? Why? A lot of people could make good use of this $6k right now, not wait until they are 65. When they can't even survive at this moment, what good does that $6k when the government tells them they'll get it at 65? They might not even make it there.
你有無睇到田二少之前做果場show㗎？對赤貧嘅人來講，有得派＄10k簡直係天文數字啦～籠屋月租千幾蚊，淨係 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-23 16:03
幫人給籠屋租金就是你的幫人目標？ 這就是解決問題的根源？真膚淺。幸行香港不是被你們這幫人掌權。
Don’t try to shift the focus to political issues, just stick to this topic. Do you dare to point out which point of what I said is not correct or reasonable? I wait for you Lik if you have the gut to do so.
When most of families can only find a low-pay job due to the limitation of their work skills. The problem of poverty will not be improved and it can get worse. $10,000 will not help them get out of the situation.
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-23 15:09
And, I should add that at this point, it is pointless for you to even ask how these people could be helped out of poverty because they've reached a point of barely being able to survive. At this point, their situations have deteriorated to the point where you need to save them from dying first. After that you look for ways to get them out of poverty.
It's no different than how a gravely sick person is in need of immediate medical attention to keep him from dying. He doesn't need any advice on how to live a healthy lifestyle right now, but that is precisely what you are preaching.
Oh, and I should add that once again, you have avoided the questions I was asking you in post #9. H ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-23 16:16
Lik, since you don't have the ability to understand what I said, I say it again in a different way so that you an idiot can understand (hopefully).
This is my direct answer to you question - “The poor already doesn't have to pay any income taxes. When they are already paying nothing, how does giving them higher exemption amounts help? How?”
First, increasing tax exemption amount can give a break to people who work and encourage the supply of labour force. That will be a plus to the economy.
Second, why some people are living under the poverty line? Isn’t it because they cannot find a better job due to their lack of competitive strengths in the labour market and lack of opportunities for them in the economy? What the government can do is to help them to improve their work skills and create more opportunities for them. The increase tax exemption might not have a direct benefit to them, giving out money is not the way to help them be more competitive in the labour market either.
Third, the government should have a systematic plan to use the surplus to easy their financial burdens (i.e. housing, transportation, education and health, etc). How would you know how those families will spend their cash bonus? They can easily spend the money on a nice meal, vocation, cloth or anything else. How would that help them change the situation they are in?
The government has certainly not done its part and neither the political parties. This is my position.
Many people like to bark anyways.
If the government gives out money, these exact people will say government is stupid, only use money to buy support and ignore about inflation problem caused by these actions.
No matter what the government do, these people will bark.
This 財政預算案 might not be the best, it's far from the worst.
發表於 2011-2-23 16:03
| 
