返回列表 發帖

退稅落空 煙稅車稅大增

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/inews/20110223/aa31350i.htm

退稅落空 煙稅車稅大增 (13:50)

財爺預算案揭盅,沒有不少人期待的退稅,但提升父母子女免稅額和寬免差餉一年。煙稅車稅均大幅增加。

根據財政司長曾俊華今日宣讀預算案,供養父母或子女的免稅額將增加2成。其中,供養60歲或以上的父母或祖父母,免稅額由現時3萬元增加至3.6萬。供養55至59歲的父母或祖父母,免稅額會由1.5萬元增加至1.8萬元,而同住的納稅人享有同樣增幅的額外免稅額。

同時,子女免稅額增加1萬,由現時每名子女5萬元增加至6萬元,子女出生年度享有的一次性額外免稅額,也由5萬提高至6萬。

另一項惠民的稅務措施,是寬免2011至12年度全年的差餉,以每戶每季1500元為上限。估計約82%物業的業主受惠。

不過,為鼓勵戒煙和抑遏私家車增長,煙草稅和汽車首次登記稅卻大幅增加。

其中,煙草稅即日起大增41.5%,每支煙的稅款調高5角,至1.706元。換言之,一包20支裝香煙,稅款就達34.12元,較之前增加達10元。

其他煙草產品的稅率,亦按同等比例增加,如每支雪茄的稅款,由1.553元增至2.197元。

汽車方面,私家車首次登記稅率,各稅階將上調5個至15個百分點,即日生效,但其他汽車類別的首次登記稅,以及現時為電動汽車和環保汽油私家車提供的優惠則維持不變。

根據建議,私家車最初15萬元應課價值的稅率,會由35%上調至40%。其次15萬元的稅率,由65%加至75%。再其次的20萬元,由85%加至100%。剩餘的應課稅價值(即50萬元以上餘額)的稅率,更由100%加至115%。

財爺未提退稅,令不少納稅人士失望,但他提出一項「不會增加通脹壓力」的派錢措施--向所有擁有強積金的市民,一次過派發6000元,注入他們的強積金戶口。

曾俊華表示,凡於今年2月23日已成為強積金計劃或職業退休計劃下,受香港《僱傭條例》涵蓋的人士,強積金戶口將獲一次過注入6,000元。

他表示,已經為這項措施預留240億元,稍後會公布詳情,希望在2011至12年度內,開始向戶口注入款項。

只能夠再三咁講:鬍鬚曾守財正仆街!特衰政府麻木不仁,置民間窒苦於不顧!

當今日香港貧富懸殊咁嚴重、政府坐擁龐大儲備、面對百物騰貴嘅壓力,你鬍鬚曾+特衰政府竟然依然可以隊份咁仆街嘅財政預算案出來,可以幫到普羅市民咩?

香港稅率本身就已經低,所以提高免稅額對本來要交稅嘅人來講根本幫助唔大。而面對貧窮問題嚴重嘅人來講,佢地本來就已經搵錢唔多,根本一開始就已經唔使交稅。所以你鬍鬚曾提高父母、子女免稅額根本就一啲都幫佢地唔到。

好喇,減差餉喎~仲要每季豪減$1500俾你班業主添!成年夾埋減$6000咁多,班業主真係要向你財爺蓋頭謝恩呀!再講,受惠嘅只係業主,窮人根本就買唔起樓,咁又何來受惠呢?所以呢個政策亦都係莫視窮人。

好喇,煙草稅又再大增。都係果句,你咪即係繼續逼戒唔到煙嘅人去買私煙同假煙?咁樣簡直係害人。

所謂嘅派錢:注$6000入佢地嘅強積金戶口。香港人真係要再一次咁多謝你呀!我今日已經窮到山窮水盡,就來連飯都無得開,但係強積金就要65歲先有得攞。我未夠65已經死Q咗啦?再者,香港強積金嘅管理費係全世界嘅基金之中最高嘅一群,而自強積金實施已來,絕大部份嘅人嘅強積金都係蝕錢嘅。但你特衰政府卻偏偏要繼續泵多啲錢入去,咁唔係益基金公司同大鱷,仲可以係啲乜?

叫你派錢又唔派,真係唔diu柒你都唔得。

-力

TOP

舊年鬧鬍鬚曾嘅說話,今年依然句句精確無比...

真係香港人嘅悲哀...

TOP

Good for Hong Kong with very strong finances, much stronger than US, UK and Canada etc.

TOP

Excerpt from the news:

http://news.mingpao.com/20110224/gaa1.htm
強積金遭詬病 學者倡改革

恒生管理學院商學院長蘇偉文認為,退稅刺激通脹大幅升溫的機會不大,「大部分納稅人都交很少稅,他們獲發的退稅額亦不多,未必會因退稅而大額增加消費」。他認為,強積金制度遭人詬病,政府卻大額注資,這是「好心做壞事」,政治上容易遭攻擊,建議政府注資的同時,必須盡快改革強積金制度,否則政策難令市民信服。

強積金一直被批評管理費過高、回報低等問題,社區組織協會主任何喜華批評,政府注資強積金是胡亂花費公帑,未有針對協助窮人抗通脹。「五無」基層勞工(沒領綜援、沒交稅、沒住公屋、沒子女、沒交差餉電費)更不能受惠,他批評政府涼薄,漠視窮人。

TOP

Good that Hong Kong does not have HST.

TOP

Good wor .. add more tax to smoke la..

Still cheap ..  $34 ..  ~ $4 cad ..

I dont understand is .. even after 75% tax ... Japanese cars over there, are still cheaper/about the same compare here ... ( and made in Japan! )

TOP

回復 2# Lik

Lik, only people who are short-sighted and lack of economic knowledge would be a supporter for giving out cash.

Ask your economic professors or people with economic background for their opinions on “giving out cash”. Haven’t I explained the reasons to you in another thread? Learn something before barking.

Without a strong economy, how would the government can help and improve the living standard of the poor? By printing bank notes? How stupid you are.

Increasing tax exemption level is a positive way used by many countries around the world and it can help the poor and encourage the economy. Learn the reasons why those countries would not choose to giving out cash.

As I already said, I agree the HK government should have done more to help the poor and needed. But “giving out cash” is not the action the government should take and it won’t help the society and HK economy in a long run.

If you want to debate with me, better get yourself prepared with some economic knowledge first.

TOP

Wow~ 5 cents Rocky is suddenly trying for civility~ Isn't that a radical change!

Look at the facts, and look around a little to see what other nearby places are doing. Macau has handed out $$ to all of their citizens for... what? the 3rd time in as many years now? Taiwan has done it as well in the midst of their economic hardships as well. Singapore or Malaysian has done the same thing as well, and certain Chinese cities are also don't the same thing. Why isn't HK doing something like that to help its citizens, esp when it has *HOARDS* of money in its reserves?

The thing is, the HKSAR government is already *extremely* rich. If they were to give out a little cash, they wouldn't be doing it by printing money or de-valuing the HKD. All they have to do is to take out tiny, tiny chunk of money from the reserves, and this will be achieved. Look at the HKSAR government figures I posted in the other thread -- if they were to give out HKD$10k to each citizen, the current reserves level would allow them to do this for 30 consecutive years. If you only give $5k, this can be done for 60 years straight. Can you imagine how much this would help those who are marginalized in the society?

If the SAR government were to give out money, a huge chunk of that money would immediately be injected into the economy to stimulate it (that is exactly what happened in TW). An increasingly larger population in HK is facing poverty, and the middle class is feeling the pinch as well. Had the government given them some money, the poor would immediately spend them to alleviate their pains of their daily lives. A little more meat on the table. A little fresher veggies instead of rotting leftovers from the market. A little assistance to let 小明 attend that field trip. A little ease on that debt. After that initial spending, the money churns around a couple more times. Had you knew any economics at all, this is known as the multiplier effect. Everybody benefits. More importantly, the money would be put to the best use by each and every individual. If they need food, they spend it on food. If they see greater benefits in investing it, they invest it however they want.

Since the SAR government is hoarding all this money, however, the only thing they know how to do with it is to invest them in bonds and stuff. So the US bonds pay 3% interest. In the hands of regular people, the economic benefits that can be produced will far exceed that 3% gain. The HK government is stupid to hoard that much cash because they are crippling economic growth themselves.

Now that I have answered your stupid questions, it's time for you to answer my meaningful ones. As usual, I doubt you'll give me straight answers anyway.

Given HK's already low tax rate, how would further lowering taxes or increasing tax exemption help the poor? The poor already doesn't have to pay any income taxes. When they are already paying nothing, how does giving them higher exemption amounts help? How?

I also see you purposely avoiding the topic of the SAR government putting money into 強積金. Please enlighten me with your infinite economics knowledge on who that move is helpful to the HK general public. It is a well-known and undisputed fact that management fees for 強積金 is way high, and that most people have lost money on the "investment". Now, let me ask you this -- who makes money on having higher 強積金 amounts? The investment firms, or regular Joe? Why is the SAR government willing to transfer this benefit to investment firms, but not to the citizens of HK? Why? A lot of people could make good use of this $6k right now, not wait until they are 65. When they can't even survive at this moment, what good does that $6k when the government tells them they'll get it at 65? They might not even make it there.

如果咁樣都唔係涼薄、唔係漠視窮人,咁點先算係呢?

Now answer me.

-Lik

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-2-23 15:15 編輯

回復 9# Lik

Lik, can you tell me how much the HKD 10,000 can change the situation of the poor? If the $10,000 can solve their problems, I will give my all vote to giving out $50,000 or even more.

If political parties want to help the poor, they should had pushed the HK government to have an long-term action plan and funding to help the poor families to improve or obtain new work skills, helping them to find new and better jobs, investing in the development of new economy so that those poor people can find better opportunities after being retrained, easing their burdens on housing, transportation and education (aren’t these the problems they are facing every day?).

When most of families can only find a low-pay job due to the limitation of their work skills. The problem of poverty will not be improved and it can get worse. $10,000 will not help them get out of the situation.

Neither the HK government, nor the political parties are willing to put commitment into this. Why? It is a long-term process with slow return and has to wait for a long time before any positive result can be shown.

Lik, if you are truly for the good of Hong Kong people, why don’t you ask your be-loved 癲狗教主 actually push the Hong Kong government to do something that can truly help the poor and needed instead of being busy on buying votes?

I would like to see the HK government to put those cash to do something that can actually benefit the poor in a long run.

TOP

返回列表