mcjohnjohn

思考左半年先辭職﹐但無找定後路?
soli 發表於 2010-9-8 08:24

剛你有一定程度既才華, 基本上, 你係唔駛找定後路, 因為路會自動舖比你行.

mcjohnjohn

if he has the EQ and the ability, he should 『撈起』, get to the TOP, be the leader and change the c ...
daimo 發表於 2010-9-8 05:44

當你一邊爬, 一邊撈起, 你既心態就會慢慢改變, 小弟認識朋友正在行緊呢一條路.

soli

剛你有一定程度既才華, 基本上, 你係唔駛找定後路, 因為路會自動舖比你行. ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-9-7 17:46

唔...o甘即係呢條精英才華唔夠~

mcjohnjohn

唔...o甘即係呢條精英才華唔夠~
soli 發表於 2010-9-8 10:57

我同呢個人唔熟, 所以不予至評.
人各有志, 只要朝著自己喜歡走的路前進便可以了.

Lik

The thing is that the present Hong Kong government structure is still the same as the British imperial system. This shows the British system has its flaws.
peter236 發表於 2010-9-7 17:06

Moron,

Go study a little before you come spew your shxt la. Prior to the 97 handover, Chris Patten proposed a fully elected Legislative Council, but Grandfather shot the idea down and reverted back to the 1/2 directly elected LegCo members, and 1/2 functional constituency seats. Same as the British system? Think a little la.

Moron~

Besides, smart has many definitions and dimensions. Being book smart is not necessarily the same thing as career smart, and being science smart is not necessarily correlated to being politically smart. To make the comment that you did only shows that you are anything BUT smart~!

-Lik

mcjohnjohn

Go study a little before you come spew your shxt la. Prior to the 97 handover, Chris Patten proposed a fully elected Legislative Council, but Grandfather shot the idea down and reverted back to the 1/2 directly elected LegCo members, and 1/2 functional constituency seats. Same as the British system? Think a little la.
Lik 發表於 2010-9-8 13:55

我成日覺得係英國佬既鬼主意... 扮哂比香港人有民主. 英國佬管治左我地百幾年, 做乜唔早d 比民主我地? 84 年已經簽左中英聯合聲明, 點解唔果陣時就比香港普選? 等到臨回歸前兩年先搞呢? 司馬昭之心, 路人皆見.

peter236

Moron,

Go study a little before you come spew your shxt la. Prior to the 97 handover, Chris Patten ...
Lik 發表於 2010-9-7 21:55

Ah Moron, our super moron, why are you trying to deceive us here?

We are not taking about the legislature here. Your article was talking about the civil servants of Hong Kong, the AO officers, in particular that one AO who quitted for whatever reason. BTW, one AO officer's comment does not represent all AO officers.

Your article was no even talking about the legislature at all. We are talking about AO officers in the government. The structure if the HK government, the civil service structure, has not changed much since 1997. It is the same British system. so if you bash the Hk system, you are just bashing the British Hong Kong system, that the British were using in HK.
   
If you don't know the difference between the legislature and the HK civil government, then you should STFU la.


Moron~

Since there are so many definitions for smart, which one of these definitions do you think I was using?
To make the comment that you did only shows that you are anything but smart.

Lik

Moron,

While the structure is very much similar to how things were under British colonial rule, the actual practices that came from the office cultural shift has changed completely since the 97 changeover.

In the old days under British colonial rule, details of policies were developed from a bottom up fashion. The director comes up with a general direction for a certain policy, and the bottom level AO's are asked to investigate various viable solutions. The different solutions are proposed, and the best one is selected by top management. Because implementation details came from front line people that are far more in tune with what is actually going on in society, the proposals are practical and sensible.

Now, since the 97 handover, the utterly useless ministers are appointed by the HKCEO, and these stupid ministers are:

1) all pro-establishment and pro-Grandfather
2) are generally very well off such that they have no sense of what life is like for the average commoner

Because of these two characteristics, when a policy is to be set, they already have a pre-determined direction that they dreamed up in their A/C office in which they want to push forward. But because they still needed to go through the civil servant machinery, the low levels AO's are only being asked to put together different policies for the sake of having those investigative studies conducted. Since only those policies that align with what the stupid minister wanted to begin with will get selected, over time, the AO's got "smart" and only start producing useless policies that closely align with what the minister wanted in the first place. If they didn't do this, their proposals don't get selected, and the AO's do get promoted or even receive a good performance review. So over time, the policies became rigid, and the office culture gets infested.

Recounts of similar stories have come from numerous current or ex AO's and other civil servants.

Do a little field research before spewing you shxt la!

-Lik

peter236

Moron,

While the structure is very much similar to how things were under British colonial rule, the ...
Lik 發表於 2010-9-8 14:33

What a pro-British self-hating moron you are? You know nothing about the HK civil government.