布小熊

I ended up watching all 5 on you tube and I felt deeply sadden by how HK government and even some people in HK not being helpful to these less lucky group. Out of the different groups, I think the elderly group really do need some help. A LOT of them worked hard when they were young. They contribute to HK's manufacturing  and construction industry. They helped build HK. But when they are old who is going to help them? The "fruit money" and old ppl money is so little and price of food is going up like crazy in HK. They are not the lazy group. They just don't have children to support them. Some of them don't even have families. One of the elderly spent most of his saving for his/his wife's medical bill. .... anyway.... I really think it's unfair for HK to dump them like this.
Here at least the government do take care of the elderly.

布小熊

Glad that some HK ppl agree with helping the needy.

加生果金訂最低工資
調查指各階層都贊成        
2008年5月15日

【明報專訊】 中大一項調查發現，增加長者生果金額及盡快立法制訂最低工資，成為社會各階層對紓緩通脹壓力的共識。有學者提醒政府，雖然市民大多認同物價上升及通漲問題由外來因素所致，但隨覑立法會選舉臨近，社會大眾對通脹注視程度上升，市民對通脹不滿有可能變成民怨。

中大亞太研究所於本月5至7日進行調查，訪問了1018名成年市民，結果發現近85%受訪者贊成增加長者生果金額，75%支持盡快制訂最低工資，而且支持聲音來自社會不同階層(見表)。研究所副所長王家英表示，任何建議取得過半市民支持，政府都應正視。

Ultraman

Poor people without ambition always have too many excuse and lead to even poorer situation. There truly are poor people worked to a success.

大C姐

我發現好多人留言但係有好多人都唔好了解關懷呢一百萬人。

問題唔係呢班人唔做野問政府囉錢唔夠洗﹐係想做可能無人請(年紀﹐社會徑濟問題)﹐就算做足7日﹐D人工都係唔夠生活﹐而且手停口停﹐做少一日工都唔夠生活費。最慘係有D家庭係連食都無啖好食﹐D細路又無人教﹐想脫貧都真係唔易。

首先最起碼係有food bank同一D免費繕食俾呢D家庭(尤其細路同老人家)。有啖好食其實對健康同工作能力有好直接影響。

第二度地方都發生同樣問題唔代表呢個唔係問題。你哋D蛋散唔係切身處地就好輕易講句﹕車~好多地方都係甘架啦。問題係﹐一個城市﹐無理由容許一班肯做肯挨既社會支柱既一份子落後到無飯開。而家唔係打仗唔係大飢荒﹐社會進步有錢賺無理由容許社會一部份既人受難﹗

-- 大發人心大C姐

[ 本帖最後由 大C姐 於 2008-5-14 21:36 編輯 ]

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-15 11:49 發表

我響荃灣坐小巴，再轉地鐵出中環都要成粒鐘啦。你天水圍響元朗再入D，仲要搭巴士同轉車，無兩粒鐘點過海呀？

另外，讀得下書就話嗟，唔係咁讀得果一群先至係最多人。就算你讀完預科，又可以做D乜？問政府借錢去讀副學士？上左佢當既 ...

天水圍出中環梗係搭巴士啦! 一程車一定唔駛一個鐘~ 大欖隧道一出就三號幹線跟住就到西隧直出上環.
車費係貴d, 要廿蚊一程. 但係中環番工既話應該afford得到.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 大C姐 於 2008-5-15 13:23 發表
我發現好多人留言但係有好多人都唔好了解關懷呢一百萬人。

問題唔係呢班人唔做野問政府囉錢唔夠洗﹐係想做可能無人請(年紀﹐社會徑濟問題)﹐就算做足7日﹐D人工都係唔夠生活﹐而且手停口停﹐做少一日工都唔夠生活費。最慘係有D家庭係連食都無啖好食﹐D細路又無人教﹐想脫貧都真係唔易。

首先最起碼係有food bank同一D免費繕食俾呢D家庭(尤其細路同老人家)。有啖好食其實對健康同工作能力有好直接影響。

第二度地方都發生同樣問題唔代表呢個唔係問題。你哋D蛋散唔係切身處地就好輕易講句﹕車~好多地方都係甘架啦。問題係﹐一個城市﹐無理由容許一班肯做肯挨既社會支柱既一份子落後到無飯開。而家唔係打仗唔係大飢荒﹐社會進步有錢賺無理由容許社會一部份既人受難﹗

-- 大發人心大C姐

小弟覺得香港既市民應該做多d 野, 多d 關心身邊既人. 不過, 我地應該點樣關心佢地先係最有用呢?

Ultraman

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-14 21:02 發表

鹹蛋超人，你咁講我會覺得你完全唔了解咩叫做赤貧，而講D咁既說話，亦好唔付責任。

長期既貧困係會不停咁磨滅人既鬥志。如果你係第一集裡果個女人，一個星期返七日工，一至五返 12個鐘，周末返 16個鐘，每日早餐食一個麵包，午餐食 ...

Your originally posted video clip is one thing (elderly)...... but weren't you discussing younger people to work in central or something in general cases? No point to discuss extreme cases, which seems like nobody can help bor.