返回列表 發帖
OTC pink 囉, 都係美國上市.... hehehehe

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-2 01:50 編輯
To quote imvitasoy, 唔識比你嚇死,識比你笑死.

Do you know what delist will do to a company's valu ...
blue20ae 發表於 2012-2-1 21:17


It is really not as simple as just cutting water, electricity and food supply, like what that stupid professor said.

As China's economy expands rapidly, more and more companies will be listed in Shanghai, New York and even Singapore, instead of Hong Kong.
Let's look at how the financial pillar of HK will be affected. The stock exchange, the accountants, lawyers, and stock brokers etc will be affected greatly. HK simply depends on Chinese IPOs. Singapore is more than happy to get all that business.

For example, Baidu.com is listed in the US only, but not in Hong Kong.

Just imagine the likes of China Mobile, China Life, Petrol China etc moving over to Singapore stock exchange, HK's rival.
These companies are already listed in Shanghai and New York. Singapore would welcome all that business.

Now let's look at how the tourism sector of HK will be affected.
China can revoke the landing rights of Cathay Pacific/Dragon Air planes in all Chinese airports. As we all know, China is the second largest air travel market in the world. All Chinese passengers will then go through the major gateways of Guangzhou and Shenzhen airports to other destinations. If that happens, HK airport, hotels, Disney, Ocean Park, and retail will be greatly affected.

Chinese factory products can be exported from the container ports in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, instead of HK.

TOP

If that happen, we'll rent ourselves to the US?

It is really not as simple as just cutting water, electricity and food supply, like what that stup ...
peter236 發表於 2012-2-2 01:32

TOP

本帖最後由 imvitasoy 於 2012-2-3 02:44 編輯

皮蛋仔,睇問題成熟小小得得? 個世界如果係咁簡單,就唔會有咁多變化。
睇你平時都有留意下新聞,點睇歐債問題 ?
中港問題同歐債問題有一個小小共通處,歐債係族裔同政治問題既混合。如果單一簡單睇,德國佬使鬼同歐豬籌謀?希臘愛爾蘭西班牙佢死佢賤啦~  
大陸同香港未必算有族裔問題,但肯定有山頭分割問題,中南海幾多派系山頭?  江朱李胡溫集嘅仔仔女女在香港控制幾多間公司? 佢哋的老婆外家情人們,又控制幾多生意? 風吹草動,香港人暴動佢哋唔會有事,還可以騎騎笑添,但是佢哋個仔女老婆情人政敵,就隨時會囉佢命,每年經香港進出中國同世界嘅敏感貨品有幾多 (有年搜出逼擊炮),香港咁多國企,九成在香港炒地,股市更是洗錢+ cap水最佳游泳池,皮蛋仔你似乎都有留意財經新聞,上年年尾連1618 大陸中冶,扑街做鍊金嘅,都在香港炒樓,大陸國企已經達到認錢唔認人嘅階段。傍邊好多唔同派金睛火眼,想玩嘢無咁易,咁多派系分 哂山頭餅仔,牽一髮動全身,講數都有排講。在大陸佬眼中,香港係個筍盤,有人揸莊,但未有人敢插旗,呢點係香港 比北京上海有吸引力嘅地方,中南海係極權,但唔係老襯,皮蛋仔你明唔明 ? ....... 講都講唔盡,唔講啦。

TOP

皮蛋仔,睇問題成熟小小得得? 個世界如果係咁簡單,就唔會有咁多變化。
睇你平時都有留意下新聞,點睇歐債 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 02:21


Hong Kong economy is just way to small compared with China's economy.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-3 04:11 編輯
皮蛋仔,睇問題成熟小小得得? 個世界如果係咁簡單,就唔會有咁多變化。
睇你平時都有留意下新聞,點睇歐債 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 02:21


Hong Kong's economy is just a very small pond for the big Chinese companies.
In our hypothetical scenario, the Chinese have so many levers that they can pull, just to squeeze out Hong Kong easily.
HK people should realize that they depend much more on the mainland than they think. It is not as simple as water or food supply. The sooner they realize, the more advantageous.

TOP

本帖最後由 imvitasoy 於 2012-2-3 05:06 編輯

回復 36# peter236

(1) 太細? 睇你點睇,正如在下講過,一年迪迪尼,一年振災,一年高鐵,一年機場擴建,一年河套,周而復始,都咪話唔和味。爛船還有三斤釘,何況對中國來說,香港未到爛船階段,香港中小企五癆七傷,但是仍然養活華南一千萬打工仔。
(2) squeeze out 香港? 無錯係好容易,但係蠢到加另一嘅人先會咁做。你講嘅情況,不是完全沒可能,而是共產內鬥到超白熱化才會發生,機會有幾大? 我唔知道,當然,中國歷史上唔少蠢人,例如毛澤東,四人幫......不過到時死嘅恐怕唔只香港一個。
(3) 香港人一早已經知道,否則唔會媽媽聲,家陣問題是香港政府同大陸打龍通。大陸佬一向唔會對香港有情,只因為香港價值雖然正在急速消磨,但仍然有肉 ..... 得閑先講呢個啦,瞓覺啦,

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-2-3 14:18 編輯
回復  peter236

(1) 太細? 睇你點睇,正如在下講過,一年迪迪尼,一年振災,一年高鐵,一年機場擴建,一 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 04:57

I don't see how Chinese companies benefit greatly from " 一年高鐵,一年機場擴建".
All these contracts are awarded to various international, Hong Kong  and some Chinese companies.
I think I posted linked proving this already. Perhaps you misssed it.

For example:
L.A. Firm Wins Design Contract for $2B Underground High-Speed Rail Terminus in Hong Kong

http://www.worldpropertychannel. ... ay-corp-ltd-957.php

Hong Kong Express rail link contracts awarded.
http://www.expressraillink.hk/en ... tracts-awarded.html

As we can see, the contracts of Hong Kong's express rail link are awarded to various foreign, Hong Kong, and Chinese companies, not just Chinese companies.

Hong Kong constructions mainly benefit local Hong Kong workers and imported workers from South East Asia.

But in any case, the scale of infrastructure projects in China are way bigger than those in Hong Kong.
Just Shenzhen alone has more infrastructure projects (railways, subways, airport buildings) going on than in Hong Kong, LOL.

迪迪尼


As they are now building a much bigger Disney in Shanghai, they don't need to go to Hong Kong's, LOL.

香港中小企

HK factories were making textiles and toys 30 yrs ago. Now they are still making textiles and toys.
They need to move up the value chain themselves, like those in Taiwan and Korea.

但係蠢到加另一嘅人先會咁做


Of course they are not going to squeeze out HK. But HK people need to realize their position. They are more dependent on China than they think.

TOP

用 PR 數據去做substantiation?  殺死人無命賠喎~    似乎你間學校認真油麻地。
扑街咯,在下犯左大錯,同你認真就輸,  講完。

TOP

用 PR 數據去做substantiation?  殺死人無命賠喎~    似乎你間學校認真油麻地。
扑街咯,在下犯左大錯,同 ...
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-2-3 15:13

In other words, you can't provide your proof for substantiation?

TOP

返回列表