我從來都無諗過我自己係衛道之士；但從你所講果啲狗屁歪理，我只係知道石仔路你呢啲甘願為極權主意作奴才 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-4-1 10:56
Did I say a word to defend CCP? I just put the facts in front of people so that they don't just listen to what you guys said. They should look at an issue from different perspectives and make their own judgments.
What you said here just a confirmation of what I just posted above. You guys cannot face a different POV and attack poeple who have a different POV.
If what I said is 狗屁歪理, why don't you stand up and point out and correct my 狗屁歪理?
there is no right or wrong but POV ...
habitrailspace 發表於 2010-4-1 07:57
Now you said it is just point of view (POV). That is fine if you guys don’t claim what you said are the facts and attacked people who have a different POV.
Did you guys realize there is a big and powerful filter and firewall in your mind and only received the information that fits your personal preferences and made up judgment based on personal biases?
So don’t claim you guys are “正義衛士” again since you guys are NOT.
Well, since no one is able to face my challenge, I will explain why I asked this question.
First, i ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-3-31 22:45
i "gift" u 4 words "朝令夕改" regarding that post
i dun want to reply to that thread. too many of ur personal attack (digging up somewhereintime's private life; not cool)
discussion is fun makes u think
there is no right or wrong but POV
grow up man. we're all lyk here.
sigh~ No freedom! basically it's dok choi jui yi! No wonder so many Chinese like to immigrate or "tau doe" out for the country for a better life la! It seems they are not being protected by their country as a citizen. If you can't even trust your governer to help protect you when you've been vitumized, how can you trust it for anything else? I think covering up the negative or concealing the truth doesn't mean problem won't exist anymore. Education and awareness is more effective.
Well, since no one is able to face my challenge, I will explain why I asked this question.
First, if Google said it is based on the law of China, then it is impossible to claim its act of not complying with the censorship is legal.
Second, if Google said it is based on the law of America, then how would the law of America is applicable to China and the operation of google.cn is within China and under the jurisdiction of Chinese law.
The American law can only regulate what cannot be done overseas according to the American law since Google is an American company, but it cannot determine what can be done overseas since that is under the law of the country which Google operates within.
I just 以事論事, and I don’t understand why Google said that. At the meantime, I also welcome challenges.
發表於 2010-3-30 21:54
| 
