It's a nice & easy way to take advantage of the system, haha... lesbian doesn't need to show proof (unable to prove someone is a lesbian, right?), 2 girls can live together and both claim mat leave, haha... then don't need to go back to school to finish her 1 yr contract... after working for a few months, then disclosing herself is a lesbian, she's done! how good it is ... she is setting a good example for other lazy bones to follow
but what about our budget? I heard school district has a huge deficit? CANADA!!!
she said "但她害怕公開指摘學校後會受到報復而喪失這些工資", what is she trying to say? she still want to get paid but critize the school, she wants to be win-win? how greedy!!!
Maternity leave is a benefit we should deserve for paying such high tax. IMHO, mat leave is no different than any other situations where people get laid off and have to get support from EI.
You are pretty funny yourself, if you find it funny.
You don't have to be so negative about everything. Wait till your wife get preg ...
akshea 發表於 2010-4-30 19:00
I only know of a system so funny as to have someone relieves for a mat leave to take mat leave, then hire another person to relieve this other mat leave, going round and round and round, then, paid for her no need to go back to work and got complained.... ended up our school district said they have no money and need all students to stay home for 10 more days because of shortage of budge, this is weelli weelli funny.... it sounds too funny to the whole world
You don't have to be so negative about everything. Wait till your wife get pregnant, let see if you gonna have her get E.I. This is just part of the program.
Believe it or not, it's always easy to pick on something and complain. Maybe if you are so smart, you can be our Governor.
ok, EI pays, then not the employer suffer, it's the govt suffer aka us, even worse
samsung 發表於 2010-4-30 16:21
the government welcomes kids. this is intended to encourage people to have kids. i think it's fair game. kids are expensive and if the government is not willing to do this, some people won't have kids because they can't afford a year off with no income.
besides, it's 55% and have to pay tax. sounds fair to me.
and if you ask parents, this 55% is only decent. just imagine you earn X dollars, and only for yourself to spend. when you have a kid, you only get half of X and you'll have to split it between you and the kid in the 1st year. (this scenario excludes other subsidies)
well... if it is only 1 yr contract, let say she is 7 months at employment, she only needs to work ...
samsung 發表於 2010-4-30 16:19
yes, birth mother gets paid for giving birth. it's not paid by the company. it's ei. and the ei amount is not the same as what she earns from her job. ei is only 55% of the average insured earnings up to a yearly maximum insurable amount of $43,200.
it's not free money, and still have to pay tax since it's a source of income.
why do you think it's ridiculous? do you mean a contract employee can take advantage ...
raima 發表於 2010-4-30 12:05
well... if it is only 1 yr contract, let say she is 7 months at employment, she only needs to work 2 months and have paid for the rest 10 months? it's not ridiculous? this type of mind set makes Canadian so poor
發表於 2010-4-29 11:49
| 
she is setting a good example for other lazy bones to follow 
