神父魔鬼論 李嘉誠擬控教區 神父, 魔鬼

Lik

http://www1.hk.apple.nextmedia.c ... amp;art_id=14662829

「我為別人為我的行動感到遺憾而遺憾。」天主教神父羅國輝日前就「魔鬼論」事件首次接受傳媒訪問，強調不會收回言論，也不會在強權面前噤聲。對於天主教香港教區為富商李嘉誠的不快表示遺憾，他深感教區出賣了他，也出賣了香港市民指教區領袖不知民間疾苦

訓斥「李嘉誠係魔鬼」的羅國輝神父連日來只透過 facebook回應事件，日前罕有接受《南華早報》訪問，詳談近日感受。香港天主教社會傳播處上周四發表澄清啟事，為魔鬼論事件引致李嘉誠不快表示遺憾。羅國輝表示，教區沒有給予他足夠機會解釋事件，發表澄清啟事前亦沒有徵詢其意見，覺得被教區出賣了，他說：「身為普通市民，我為何不可根據天主教的教義發表個人意見？」

羅國輝續指，教區向富商低頭，反映長駐半山區工作的教區領袖不知民間疾苦，「他們與市民的感受有一大段距離」。他說教區領袖不應向強權及財力鞠躬，要放低自我，聆聽市民聲音。

剛過去的萬聖節，新蒲崗善導之母堂舉行另類哈囉喂晚會，羅國輝為該堂主任司鐸。他在活動前接受記者訪問，諷刺地產商是魔鬼，「如果李嘉誠今晚嚟呢，肯定嚇死咗，佢好驚收尾嗰幾年 o架，啲發水樓一嚟呢，佢今晚肯定會驚死，如果大家樂嚟仲驚，所以嗰啲至係真正食人嘅魔鬼呀」。

譴責的是罪惡　非單一個人

羅國輝指，當時語氣輕鬆幽默，想不到報道一出即惹來李嘉誠不快。他說魔鬼論不是衝着李嘉誠而來，而是針對本港失控的樓價及日益嚴重的貧富懸殊問題。他說只是以李嘉誠作例子，「我譴責的是罪惡，而不是單一個人。」

對於社會的種種不公義，羅國輝感同身受。他表示，年輕時曾在九龍一間電子工廠任職技術員，親身體驗前線員工的權利如何遭僱主無理剝削。 1979年擔任神父至今，無數次的基層家庭探訪令他知道民間疾苦，世態炎凉。本港現今樓價高企，地產商橫行無忌，有年輕教友曾經問他：「神給人類創造世界，但為何香港人不能擁有自己的居所？為何正直的人找不到工作？」

「耶穌為何被釘十字架？因祂從不怕說出自己的意見。」羅國輝強調會繼續為受壓迫的人發聲。

CWong

with the China goverment behind Mr Lee, he can do whatever he wants!

Lik

sheep

I was listening to an analysis yesterday, and it seems to make quite a lot of sense. Essentially, th ...
Lik 發表於 2010-11-2 15:38

    Or, it is the tactic of Li+x to stop the media form quoting it. He just file a lawsuit and let it stand for a no of years and withdrawn it. Soon people will forget it.

Lik

I was listening to an analysis yesterday, and it seems to make quite a lot of sense. Essentially, the lawyers warning only amounts to a gag order against the press and a scare tactic on the general public. The ridiculous thing with slander/libel cases in HK is, the moment the "victim" files a lawsuit on it, any further media reporting on the case may also get the media company into part of the slander/libel accusation. That is to say, once Superman Lee+x started suing Father Law for slander, if Fruit Daily quotes Father Law's original comment again in its reporting of the lawsuit, Fruit Daily might very well be named as part of the defendant in the slander lawsuit as well.

I personally find this to be rather ridiculous since newspapers have the social duty to report on news incidents that are of interest to the public. If they can't even quote the original sources in their reporting, then it just makes no sense. But for a lot of the newspapers, they don't want to go through the trouble of a lawsuit even though nothing might come out of it at the end. But with 肥佬黎, the only good thing about him is that he won't stop/censor his editors' articles simply out of fear of getting sued.

-Lik

chunsh

no wonder why communism was born

kingkong123

放心啦，死要面姐，如果李嘉诚会告的话他就白做香港首富啦
没可能告教会的，放一百个胆啦

habitrailspace

妖! 大家立場唔同姐. 跟佢揾食個D就話李生係神

CWong

神父夠老实，講得好！神父，我撐你！