香港攝影大神 鄭中基

快樂牛郎

http://www.douban.com/photos/photo/758946956/

鄭中基27萬的相機 惹出一堆“羨慕嫉妒恨”

這兩天，一篇名為《震驚了！》的帖子在網上瘋傳，該帖爆料稱攝影界鼎鼎大名的“大神Tinyeyes”的真身正是香港演員、歌手鄭中基，該帖子稱：“Tinyeyes是當年Flickr上最優秀的徠卡相機攝影師之一，與日本的TommyOshima齊名，

Look4chrisng

回復 39# 快樂牛郎


   Thank you

快樂牛郎

I just want to say *any* type of cameras (including M9 and Noctilux) can produce good photography.Look4chrisng 發表於 2010/12/28 10:52

I don't think there's any debate on that.  It's agreed upon.

Look4chrisng

You seriously think Photoshop can replace a lens that give good bokeh, or a m9 with Noctilux?

*sh ...
biggie 發表於 2010-12-28 02:09

Oh, sorry if my messages to have you come across as "equipment is irrelevant".

I just want to say *any* type of cameras (including M9 and Noctilux) can produce good photography.

Look4chrisng

What if i show up with a cheap point and shoot for your wedding photogrsphy when the times come?
chobit 發表於 2010-12-28 08:08

Yes, if Eugene Richard shows up with a Holga at my wedding.  I will be very happy.

chobit

What if i show up with a cheap point and shoot for your wedding photogrsphy when the times come?

When this photo is up for sales, do you thank the buyer cares about the camera was used to take t ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2010-12-20 15:23

biggie

回復  Look4chrisng


I think this photo is shooted by a regular Dslr, and it was photoshoped to get the ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2010-12-20 15:51

You seriously think Photoshop can replace a lens that give good bokeh, or a m9 with Noctilux?

*shakes head*
The soccer analogy is a joke. Without certain equipment and lens, you can't even get certain effects. I am not saying those effects necessarily make good photos, but to discount that having better equipments is irrelevant for taking better photos is a joke.

ricrick

15 years ago, people spend days in the darkroom trying different combinations to make the photo look ...
shutterbug 發表於 2010-12-24 12:34

you are right

shutterbug

15 years ago, people spend days in the darkroom trying different combinations to make the photo look better.  The idea is not much different than people today with Photoshop.  It's just that Photoshop can do more and quicker.

ricrick

u will need to process it at the end anyway, u won't keep raw forever
in fact, all digital files are numbers only.. its not "photo" actaully