日本棄儲水方案開始排毒水 放射性, 核污染, 共同社, 香港

ecwkwok

[明報] 福島第一核電站晚上7時03分(香港時間傍晚6時03分)，開始把11,500噸超標100倍的輻射水排入海中。

早前當地傳媒早前表示，明日才向大海排放輻射水。據東電稱，這些廢水的放射性物質濃度約是法定標準的100倍。

福島第一核電站營運商東京電力公司稱，公司一度計劃將4號機組的廠房等主要建築用作儲水設施，逐步把積水轉移，但已放棄這一計劃，決定把低度核污染廢水排放入海。

共同社稱，東電原本想以犧牲主要設備為代價，把廠房用作儲水設施以確保修復反應堆冷筢功能所需的作業場所，但之後發現4號機組的渦輪廠房與3號機組相連，無法用於儲水。

另有方案提出新建儲水槽或將廢水移送至鋼製浮體。東電認為這些方案能儲存的廢水有限，遂決定排水入海。此舉能否解決問題尚不明朗。

日本傳媒稱，晚上7時03分先排走1萬噸廢棄物處理施設施的積水，晚上9時才排走第5和第6號機組內的1500噸廢水。(綜合)

  老實講, 日本仔話只係超標100倍, 我唔信囉...如果係咁低危險, 當初就一早排o左出海喇...將來全世界可能都要為日本仔呢個不負責任o既決定受苦...
o岩o岩聽電視新聞講, 有記者冒險進入近電廠20 里, 儀器已經顯示空氣中幅射已經係危險程度, 何況係電廠排出來D水? 另外, o係電視見到附近避難所裡面D小孩子已經捱o左好耐餓喇...仲係主要靠義工們冒險入去救濟...聽講響果度o既好多都係電站裡面博緊命o既員工o既家屬...

Guy

Don't why the tokyo electric co. didn't just abandon the plant and cover in cement once in for all... there is no way the plant can recover.

how can you rebuild a leaking reactor when the build fell over it. or rebuild the building when the reactor is leaking.

no way..

yayaya

so which one has more long lasting effects?

radiation in Japan sea or BP blow up in Mexico Gulf?

o ...
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-4-4 11:09

why do you care which one has more long lasting effect?
you already prepared to die

快樂牛郎

so which one has more long lasting effects?

radiation in Japan sea or BP blow up in Mexico Gulf?

one thing is for sure though
we are heading towards extinction

daimo

They killed so many sharks for their fins (of course it's the Chinese who bought them at the end) that they even put shark fins on ramen ... in the Sendai region ...

crazy

ecwkwok

the tsunami crippled the shark/whale fishing industry in that area ...

D鯨魚唔比日本仔捕鯨船殺死, 都可能會中日本核電廠幅射毒死, 死得仲慘仲徹底...

librazhy

向大海排放輻射水will make some impacts to the food chain

daimo

well, one thing positive ...

the tsunami crippled the shark/whale fishing industry in that area ...