收到數個有關大選的email, 轉載給大家討論吓 4 email

satil

收到數個有關大選的email, 轉載給大家討論吓4

=====================================================================

很多人說‘保守黨哈珀’講大話，就讓我們找找證據（ ４）

‘保守黨’削減醫療、教育、社會服務撥款？

　是真的嗎？

根據公開的數據：http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/govt48b-eng.htm（因2010年的Consolidated report未出，所以只以2005-2009年數據為基礎）

綜合政府支出

	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009
	$ millions
Total expenditures	516,576	547,465	578,174	616,090	631,251
General government services	18,792	20,074	20,857	21,505	22,822
Protection of persons and property	41,096	43,299	46,396	50,689	50,790
Transportation and communication	21,172	24,838	26,280	29,966	32,197
Health	94,497	99,531	107,497	114,245	121,577
Social services	156,762	164,568	174,290	187,734	190,276
Education	77,140	84,760	87,455	92,722	95,732
Resource conservation and industrial development	18,652	19,760	21,078	21,360	19,975
Environment	11,903	13,158	14,420	15,516	16,933
Recreation and culture	13,476	14,268	15,008	15,809	16,306
Labour, employment and immigration	2,328	2,480	2,619	2,917	2,395
Housing	3,880	4,527	4,942	5,544	6,120
Foreign affairs and international assistance	5,556	5,585	6,500	6,211	6,508
Regional planning and development	2,057	2,235	2,338	2,524	2,775
Research establishments	1,823	1,859	2,023	2,332	2,268
General purpose transfers	0	..	..	..	..
Debt charges	45,506	44,784	45,578	45,715	43,634
Other expenditures	1,935	1,738	894	1,303	945

2006年起，‘保守黨’不斷增加各項目的撥款，特別是：

健康醫療　由‘自由黨’的944億，‘保守黨’增至1,215億元。（平均每年增長7.2%）

‘自由黨’承諾若他們重新執政，每年將加6%  ，豈不是反而減了，真是一個笑話。

社會服務　由‘自由黨’的1,568億，‘保守黨’增至1,902億元。（平均每年增長5.3%）

教育　由‘自由黨’的771億，‘保守黨’增至957億元。（平均每年增長6.1%）

住房　由‘自由黨’的388億，‘保守黨’增至612億元。（平均每年增長14.4%）

實際上，由於‘保守黨’政府成功以減稅刺激經濟，增加了政府的收入，才能對每一個項目撥款都每年遞增，遠超通貨膨脹的比率。

事實顯示，‘保守黨’從來沒有減少撥款，反而是每年增加。

閒人一個

咁緊要的訊息一定要幫手推一推, 上番頂多d人睇.

AnitaMok

I won't vote for Liberal anymore !

somewhereintime

I think the Liberals are even worse than when they were in power,
I used to vote for them when JC was the PM

閒人一個

乜話! 新民主黨有冇挍錯, 咁既例都提出, 最冇人性都係自由黨, 點可以同流合污.
咁我重點比個女去公共泳池個更衣室, 又點比佢入公厠, 駛唔駛我又話係女人, 跟埋入去. 痴線既!!

過去兩年, 就信佢叫大家投個小數保守黨政府就中計啦! 現在現晒形啦, 睇吓三隻冇人性幾容易就通過這些法案. 聽講差點又通過IPOD TAX, 每部MP3功能既機都想收$75. 咁我部Iphone, galaxy tab, ipod, 電腦.. 加加埋埋一家人要比成千蚊稅. 又係新民主黨同自由黨挍出嚟. 咁比佢地兩個話事, 我地要比多幾多稅, 又有幾多新稅項? 痴線既!!

AnitaMok

The bill was initiated by NDP MP Bill Siksay. Majority of Conservative party voted against this bi ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-17 13:09

    As you say, if next government is Conservative minority, with the rest of the tree parities can pass this ridiculous bill ?!

Whats happening to Liberal party!! What will be next??

RIDICULOUS!! RIDICULOUS!!

rockypath

回復  satil

what!! when?? man can come into woman washroom?
can i say i am a man and go into man  ...
AnitaMok 發表於 2011-4-17 11:03

The bill was initiated by NDP MP Bill Siksay. Majority of Conservative party voted against this bill. But majority of NDP, Liberal and Bloc Québécoi support this bill. Since the Conservative is a minority, the bill will be passed in the house of common regardless how the Conservative voted.

You can view how this bill was voted in the house and as well as the MP of your area by following this link: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HouseCham ... rl=40&FltrSes=3

Lik

我同意選保守黨做4年大多數政府, 由人民及傳媒做監察, 做得好, 比多4年, 做得唔好, 4年後由人民推佢落台. 過去幾年反對黨根本沒有代表人民做好監察角式. 反對黨根本自私自利. 你用小數黨政府把他縛手縛腳, 沒法發揮, 又話佢做得唔好, 似乎不合道理.
閒人一個 發表於 2011-4-16 15:52

我都曾經同師兄嘅想法一樣，但過去呢好幾年所法生嘅事話俾我聽，Harper 處事實在都幾霸道。好在，佢只係一個少數政府，吓吓都俾其他黨派揸住個春袋唔敢太過亂來，而且亦要同大家四四六六咁拆掂條數、顧及各方面利益。所以其實我唔太介意再一次見到 Harper 帶領嘅少數政府。

最重要嘅係，我相信加拿大人嘅集體智慧同埋我地國家所有嘅制度。我有信心加拿大人會挑選一個稱職嘅政府，而就算我地真係蠢咗，三四年之後（甚至更早）人民都可以再一次當家作主。

如果國家無一個最少係相對完善嘅政治體制，咁又邊度配稱自己為央央大國？你估真係財大氣粗、有錢大撚晒咩？

-力

somewhereintime

回復 14# AnitaMok

Glad the insane bill did not pass in parliament, but it is true

AnitaMok

回復 7# satil

what!! when?? man can come into woman washroom?
can i say i am a man and go into man washroom?
do i have the right to say no, when a man come into our (ladies) washroom?
how about changing room?
who pass this bill?
it is crazy !!!!!!