突發奇想－如果黃毓民是特首，長毛是財爺 生意

rockypath

為何有此奇想，我相信大家自然都知道原因。因此發此帖看看大家是如何看的。

許多事情是說得容易做時難。我相信特別是做過生意或打理過自己公司的人應該知道我在說什麼並深有體會吧。

rockypath

仆街，

講咁撚多野，又唔見你攞啲數據出來證明個 area 點變咗做高尚住宅區？你估齋起棟豪宅，個地頭就會自 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-18 10:16

仆街，

You don't like google it? Then try Youtube la. It should be more fun to watch. Use your hand to do some research and use your brain to understand what you found la (if you are not mentally retarded)....... idiot.  

戇撚鳩～

Lik

仆街，

講咁撚多野，又唔見你攞啲數據出來證明個 area 點變咗做高尚住宅區？你估齋起棟豪宅，個地頭就會自動變咗做高尚住宅區呀？

戇撚鳩～

-力

rockypath

你嘅一貫 cheap 招又來喇～你要問我攞數據，我確實係無。但點解你問我之前，我又唔見你攞啲數據來躂返我轉 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-18 08:55

Hahha... I know you cannot find the number and I didn't not expect you to give a number. My question is just to remind you the size of HK real estate is not that small as you imagine.

The impact is not from the luxury projects themselves but the price increase of the area due to the establishment of luxury real estate projects because now the area becomes a 高尚住宅區. You can find the percentage of price increase on web. Who are the major investors in the non-luxury units? It is the HK money plays the role.   

Does this help you understand what I said better?  Use your brain, idiot.

你自己毫無見識，但又要打橫來講，去仆街啦～

Lik

In Hong Kong, most people live in highrise buildings, therefore normally the biggest real estate developers can afford to buy lands and develop them.
peter236 發表於 2011-7-18 01:47

低能仔，

唔係 high唔 highrise 嘅問題，而係特衰政府同香港本土嘅大地產商官商勾結打籠通，用各式各樣嘅建築條例來逼死晒其他外來嘅競爭對手，所以響香港嘅建築界係完全無外來嘅建築公司。而香港本土嘅大地產商不斷用 delayed benefits 嘅手段來買通港府高官、地證、屋宇處嘅人，當佢地在位嘅時候就幫地產商講好說話，唔對佢地做打壓，批地明益佢大地產商，然後等佢地呢班前高官、地證、屋宇處嘅人退休之後過完冷河先至再高薪厚祿咁請佢地做掛名（或實質）顧問來答謝佢之前為商家所做嘅事。又或者利用呢批前地證、屋宇處嘅人對條例嘅熟悉，響唔同嘅漏動上賺多好多其他發展商賺唔到嘅錢。（例如起多啲商場面積、建築vs實用面積嘅漏動、申請上手續來留難細／外地發展商）等等。

呢啲就叫做香港嘅地產霸權。你唔撚識就去仆街兼收聲！

-力

Lik

Ok, just tell me what is the percentage of these 富貴新樓盤 compare to the size the real estate ma ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-18 00:52

你嘅一貫 cheap 招又來喇～你要問我攞數據，我確實係無。但點解你問我之前，我又唔見你攞啲數據來躂返我轉頭？反之，一出 post 嘅時候，我已經俾咗 anecdotal evidence 你，叫你去問吓香港新樓盤啲經紀。點解你又唔去問完先至返來同我地講？

如果你係咁易 Google、百度一吓「香港新樓盤」呢幾個字，你就會立即見到唔知幾多殘體字嘅網頁廣告同報導。

你自己毫無見識，但又要打橫來講，去仆街啦～

-力

peter236

Ok, just tell me what is the percentage of these 富貴新樓盤 compare to the size the real estate ma ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-18 00:52

In other words, you don't have an answer why Canada does not build enough 居屋?

You don't have an answer why only 地產霸權 can afford to buy the lands in downtown Toronto/Vancouver?

In Hong Kong, most people live in highrise buildings, therefore normally the biggest real estate developers can afford to buy lands and develop them.

rockypath

話你死蠢就即係死蠢。香港家陣嘅外來資金（特別係用咗去買樓果啲），有幾多唔係由大陸走落來？！你唔識野就 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-18 00:36

Ok, just tell me what is the percentage of these 富貴新樓盤 compare to the size the real estate market of HK?

Just tell you up front, I have hidden questions in this question. Just want to see whether you know what you are actually talking about.

Maybe I shouldn't continue to waste my time on you this shameless idiot mad dog.

Lik

話你死蠢就即係死蠢。香港家陣嘅外來資金（特別係用咗去買樓果啲），有幾多唔係由大陸走落來？！你唔識野就去一轉香港嘅富貴新樓盤，同啲經紀問吓有邊個買家唔係國內同胞。再唔係就自己去一轉啲新興豪宅區，睇吓你聽廣東話多定係國語多。而啲人買樓，要來投資只係其中一個考慮。之前我講得好清楚（唔係好似你咁講到一舊舊），所以唔再講喇。

-力

rockypath

As I have already said in my post, the high end luxury (real estate) market is unlikely to cool down all that much because the hot money from China doesn't necessarily / strictly view the luxury units as a pure investment vessel.

Lik 發表於 2011-7-17 18:07

Don't understand my English? Ok, I will try to write it in a simpler form to fit your brain.

First, you misunderstood me again. The free (hot）money I said is the money that was freed up from the real estate market, but not the money from mainland China.

Second, even though I don't have the statistic, I don't think the money comes from the mainland China has significant impact to the price of HK real estate. You can prove me wrong if you have the information.