Catpiano

I just dont get it ..

May be just me ..  but saying " which Canon and Nikon lens is comparable with Sony .. "  to me .. is insulting  ..  insulting to Nikon/Canon ..  

It is like saying " An Acura TL, which BMW/.BENZ is almost as good as it ? " or like saying " I am driving a BMW 3 series, which PORSCHE or Ferrari is as good as my car? "   

I am sure Sony is big and rich .. they hv money to make good technology stuffs too ..   but ..  put SONY in same boat with Canon / Nikon  in photography ??   may just 10 yr .. or even 20 yr too early !

Check out what kind of lens people use in Olympic !!


Spend sometime here first, my friend -->  www.dpreview.com

[ 本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2008-7-28 11:50 編輯 ]

Catpiano

Man man man ..

OH MAN OH MAN ...  

so..   Sony 50mm is same as Leica 50mm too ?  

Why dont you go to chapter or whatever book store ..  buy some ( or at least ONE )  Photography book.

Um .. make it easlier for you to understand ... a Mustang GT500 .. is ~ 500HP ..  a Ferrari F430 Scuderia is 500HP too ..   but I can say they are the same ..


Again, Minolta 70-200 APO is a great lens, however, I guess they dont sell as near as the volume of Nikon or Canon ...  and of course, when SONY rebadge this lens, SONY is always talk about money, so SONY has rised the price to even about Canon and Nikon ..  

I won't be surprised, Canon  70-200mm IS  outsells Sony/KM one  10 to 1  or even 50 to 1 ..  therefore, SONY rather set a higher price for it .. deal to LOWER volume.

(P.S. yes, sony DSLR are LOWEST price compare to other brand, but this is marketing .. their  entry lens are cheap too, however, once you go to higher end range, they are way over price  .. but this is business, all about making money, and how many SONY DLSR users care about the ultimate quality? )

Catpiano

When SB and I bought our 70-200IS ..  they were like $26xx ....     

But I guess now, they sell more ..  and NIKON is kicking their a-s now ..  so ..  Canon has to lower their price ..