人權 vs 顧念他人 工作, 加拿大

Littleprince

與朋友談起一個情況﹐
她的公司是辦公室形式﹐
即是人人座位很近﹐
只是一板之隔。。。

若是旁邊聽收音機﹐
一定騷擾著她的工作﹐
若她叫她關掉﹐
是否侵犯了人權﹖

另外﹐
又有另一位同事喜歡工作時唱歌﹐
各位覺得﹐
若是叫她收聲有否侵犯人權呢﹖

這個人權問題﹐
在加拿大已經變成了很可笑的現象。。。

吸煙的人有人權﹐
難道不吸煙的人沒有﹖
為何為了他們的人權﹐
要不吸煙的人放棄他們的人權呢﹖
不吸煙的人沒有不忍受二手煙的權利嗎﹖

同樣地﹐
圖書館高聲談笑是他們的人權﹐
可是其他使用者的人權又怎樣呢﹖

myversa

This is the biggest drawback of Canada.... Human Right....

Giving too much freedom and people start to do whatever they want without suffering any consequence.

B仔

適可而止~

daimo

人權? whoever cries the loudest gets it.

that's so unfortunate.

siumaibb

I always think you should know how to behave yourself before you can get any freedom, that is why we got legal age, however, I think some people physically past legal age but mentally did not. And I think there is where all the problems started.

Ultraman

Besides "human rights", people should beware of "nuisance" too.

A nuisance would occur if your colleague right besides you turns his/her radio on in a tone that affect your comfort level, he/she is committing a nuisance to you. He/she can use a headphone to continue his/her enjoyment.

Bylaws also prohibit people smoking inside any public building area, including at the entrance within a certain distance. Smokers should beware to occur any unnecessary nuisance to others.

Speaking in an unreasonably loud voice or intentionally making loud noise in a public library is not allowed. That causes nuisance to others too.

However, if there isn't a plaintiff (complainer), and nobody is gonna carry out the rule, it's as useless as there is no rule.

rainbow-davie

This is not really about Human Right.  NOthing wrong with Human Right. it is how people interpret it.

For ANY system, ANY idealogy, ANY THING in the world, when it is new, many people will follow it and say it is perfect.  But ONCE people get used to it, they will try breaking it, finding excuse or gray area to benefit for themselves.  This is human nature.  You just cannot change it.

Think about this, if there is problem with Human Rights, then how about get ride of Human Right?  MOre problems, right?  then how about we come up with " Human Right 2.0", do you think it will stop people abusing the system for their own benefit?  it won't.  

IT IS JUST HUMAN PROBLEM, HUMAN NATURE.

Imposing stricter law won't solve it.
Creating new law won't solve it forever.
making more law not only won't solve it but create more problem
losening law won't be good.
No law is even worse.

So, solution is. no solution. unless human is no longer what we are.

[ 本帖最後由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-3-12 16:26 編輯 ]

claichan

Aside from Human Rights, 同事之間都應存亙相尊重之心.
如果好聲好氣的跟對方提及噪音問題,
應該沒問題吧?
大公司可以到人事部反影一下都ok.
好像我同事香水太厲害,
沒有人敢對她說,
唯有勞煩人事部擺平.

chobit

Agree

Purpleheart

“若是旁邊聽收音機﹐
一定騷擾著她的工作﹐
若她叫她關掉﹐
是否侵犯了人權﹖”

呢個問題好容易解決o者, 只要用friendly 既態度同個同事講, 問佢可唔可以將收音機音量較細一點, 因為我正在集中工作~ 如果個同事唔係想玩野, 通常都會合作或者拿個 headphone出黎~ by human rights 佢有權聽收音機, 但無理由等於可以騷擾其他人工作 !!

“吸煙的人有人權﹐
難道不吸煙的人沒有﹖
為何為了他們的人權﹐
要不吸煙的人放棄他們的人權呢﹖
不吸煙的人沒有不忍受二手煙的權利嗎﹖”

冇錯, 人有權食煙, 所以政府就立例不准在室內抽煙~ 所以對我地呢o的非煙民黎講, 已經係減少一個吸二手煙的機會!!

我以前讀書o個陣都有去public library 讀, 亦有人高聲談話, 亦有些情侶淫聲浪語~ 我會走埋去同佢講, 唔好意思, 呢度係圖書館, 請你地安靜或者出去傾計, 因為我正在集中溫習~ 好多人都會尷尬離開或者去第二度繼續傾~

因此, 結論係, 冇人會幫你爭取權利, 除左你自己!!