peter236

That is why google should be boycotted because of their map car.

chobit

This is for the US.
You have a camera. But do you know your rights when it comes to public photography? You’ll learn them here.

Public photography is wide open
That’s the general rule. When you’re on public property (a street, sidewalk, city park, etc) you can take pictures of what you see. This means that you can also photograph private property as long as you’re not trespassing to get the shot.

Unfortunately, life is never that simple. There are a couple exceptions to the rule and other details you need to know.

Does the photo subject expect privacy?
Even on public property, you can’t photograph somebody who has a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” Basically, that means you can’t snap shots of people in the bathroom, a dressing room, or similar places. Ask yourself: “Would the average person expect privacy?” If so, don’t take a photo.

Along the same lines, don’t sneak photographs of people from bizarre angles. In essence, you can’t go around taking “up skirt” photographs. Even if you’re on the public sidewalk.

Is it a question of national security?
It was news to me, but military bases and nuclear facilities can restrict photographs – even from the outside area. Even if you’re not trespassing onto government land, taking pictures of these installations could be illegal.

Don’t even try. We’re not talking misdemeanor illegal. You might be shipped off and never seen again. Yep, crazy illegal!

chobit

If u see my post, then you understand that she should not be responisble to this...!  

The photos were probably taken with some ging long zoom lense la. There is nothing she can do if she ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-22 10:25

habitrailspace

I don't think there's a problem to dress like that at home.  Its her own time at home, she can wear  ...
cremedelacreme 發表於 2010-6-22 11:33

agreed! once the public or the doggie team get use to it, NOT a news anymore!
should go to the next level...

chunsh

cher
nothing special to look for

cremedelacreme

Yeah, 香港的狗仔隊 are pretty low class.  They always like to capture ppl's underwear, 露bra strap, 露蔭毛, 加厘雞印,  etc etc...Stuff like that and ZOOM it super big.  So mo liu~

Guy

It's not sex scene. it's just home being ownself. why is this the cover news?

chowB

Yeah, 香港的狗仔隊 are pretty low class.  They always like to capture ppl's underwear, 露bra strap,  ...
cremedelacreme 發表於 2010-6-22 13:14

Well..... market and demand la. It's the public being low class, they just do what the public like to see jeh. (doesn't mean i agree what they're doing is right) Sad in the City la.

Lik

If u see my post, then you understand that she should not be responisble to this...!
chobit 發表於 2010-6-22 12:46

From the photos, it seems like she was only in the living / dining room?

I agree that we should expect a certainly level of privacy in the comfort of our own homes. However, I don't believe the living / dining room is entitled to the same level of privacy we should expect in our bedrooms and especially in the washrooms.

Simply speaking, I think the living / dining room is fair game if you leave your curtains open. Is it good to have your photos taken like that? Certainly not. But hey, she is the one that did this with the open curtains. I say she gotta expect some sort of responsibility la.

-Lik

habitrailspace

From the photos, it seems like she was only in the living / dining room?

I agree that we should ex ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-22 14:10

should we charge her for 露体狂