samsung

also we can predict that dragging will have what kind of result = the little girl will get hurt more and she might be died... this kind of ppl deserve an immediately death punishment, she has done it right, salute!

news

good tht she got the guy..if she missed by a little..the girl would be dead instead

jh66

good tht she got the guy..if she missed by a little..the girl would be dead instead
news 發表於 2010-7-12 09:13

禁樣開槍對人質太危險了,如果匪徒醒目一d人質會無命gar.

KittyLeung74

禁樣開槍對人質太危險了,如果匪徒醒目一d人質會無命gar.
jh66 發表於 2010-7-12 19:34

totally agree!

sheep

咁講
個女仔矮個賊成個頭
個女警咁近距離
佢哋練槍都係瞄準目標嘅要害
瞄準個頭開槍 槍咁響
嚇都嚇到呆咗
再行近啲 補多四槍
面不改容 好有信心
個女仔應該好安全

jh66

唔係高矮ge問題,女警由蚊槍到射擊至少花左6秒.呢6秒足夠時間吉死人質了.

playingtoy

in an ideal world: no one deserves to die or be killed

samsung

回復 17# playingtoy

unfortunately we are living in a real world, not an ideal world

Arlui

I don't think police here can shoot like this without a public outcry of police violence...
We are so sensitive here about shooting..

habitrailspace

comment from utube:

本人睇法, 不在於, 女警, 人質或疑匪, 而是最基本法律之意義何存, 法律之所以存在, 是給予公平, 公正...不論你是富或貧, 好與壞, 都應由它作出判斷, 如果大家都認為, 人質是無辜, 疑匪是抵死, 所以疑匪要死的話, 那麼太危險了, 假如當局沒作出檢討及傳播界給此案作出合理及英雄化, 他朝有日, 此案為案例的話, 那麼祇要你是持"槍"法治者, 他便可以有機會作出有合理化之借口去做他認為合理合法的行為........那麼法律之存在, 何等意義呢?