I don't think 王岸然 is slamming Anson without reason. The whole point of the "mortgage door" incident is exactly what he stated, "法律，是有客觀標準的，不會為個人主觀意志所轉移。一眾泛民小政客包括曾經被誤會為會為法律公義而戰的大狀議員，一個二個為政治利益而變臉，一句抹黑就將解釋的責任推得一乾二淨。法律對這些人物而言，只是律人嚴而律己寬的政治工具，也不應太過意外。" As far as I know, Anson still haven't provide enough proof on the issue to clean herself up. Remember I brought up the point that her background is not as clean as the media/politicians portrayed before? No matter what reason is it, a rule is a rule and everyone should be treated equally. When the gov't enforce the 70% mortgage rule back in the 90s, the bank you have only gave her 70% maximum. Remember why we had the 70% mortgage rule at that time? It is to discourage overheating property investment. Either way, Anson was corrupted with greed. She used her high position in the gov't to get around the rule for her SELF INTEREST. There is no difference as Leung Gum Chong bought his new Lexus given that he knows the tax will be increased. You and the self called "pro-democracy" ppl distracted the issue by claiming it is throwing mud. No, this is not throwing mud. This is called holding Anson credible to what she have done. On the other hand, what ppl found fault with Reginia Yip was just because she was helping gov't to promote an unpopular law. Let me say this again, it WAS her RESPONSIBILITY to do that AS A CIVIL SERVANT IN HER THAT PARTICULAR POSITION. All these should not harm Reginia's credibility as a politician.
It is clearly stated that "The term of office of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be five years" in the Article 46 of the Basic Law. Traum, again you need to learn more about politics before you are throwing out accusations. Just like many presidents in other countries, Chief Executive can only be in the office for a limited time. Therefore the voters still can kick Chief Executive out if they want. You really need to stop this dirt smearing.
No, even they practiced democracy, it won't make the citizen smarter. If your point was valid, Chen Shui Bian won't be elected again after the first 4 years of bad governance, so is GW Bush. Did you even remember all those crazy scandal involved in those elections? Democracy is just an illusion to "majority rules", it is not about what's right or wrong. It is about who can deceive the most people. It is just a bunch of liars doing their lip service about a year before the election.
It's true that citizens were pushed to disparity in 2003, but you also need to understand they cannot blame everything to the HKSAR gov't. HKSAR didn't spread SARS, didn't brought Avian Flu to themsevles, everyone was pissed due to so many unfortunate incidents happened in such a short time and the economy plummeted as normal. The HKSAR gov't was not wise to promote such unpopular law at that moment, and they suffered the consequence already. Tung and Reginia resigned. PRC did not dare to bring it up again in near future.
Finally, you were dead wrong to associate democracy with freedom. Again, I have stated this issue before, it all boils down to what kind of freedom you want. Do you agree everyone should have gun ownership freedom? When people say speech/religion freedom, should people allowed to spread racist messages or cult messages? Democracy is just one kind of freedom, stop exergeratting it to involve everything. People who truly understand freedom and democracy will not misled by your false claims.
I am so disappointed at your false accusation again. I just cannot stand no one here dare to counter your fallacy point by point, I would not even want to spend so much time pointing out where you were wrong. I was just hoping other LYK can see the other side of the argument instead of being brainwashed by your constantly baseless Hong Kong gov't bashing. |
發表於 2007-12-3 05:32
| 
.gif)
