Lik

低能仔，

好明顯就係，新華社只會公報同轉載對中共有利嘅消息同新聞。出邊有咁多指責中共響六四屠城嘅報導，又唔見佢轉載？大陸自己有解放軍走出來承認武力鎮壓，但點解我又唔見新華社出來報？

佢（新華社）咁做，唔係想洗人腦又係乜野？你咁都信佢嘅話，唔係被洗腦又係乜野？

-力

peter236

how 新華社 can wash your brain when they are just referring to the article from japantimes and info from wikileak...maybe you should stop barking for once and look at something objectively
news 發表於 2011-7-12 11:28

We don't expect Mr Lik to be objective to new information. He believes what he wants to believe.

news

回復 11# Lik

    so according to your logic...the source of the article is also trying to brain wash their readers the chinese army didn't allegedly kill the students during the black out?

Lik

so according to your logic...the source of the article is also trying to brain wash their readers the chinese army didn't allegedly kill the students during the black out?
news 發表於 2011-7-12 14:02

I'm saying, Xinhua "news" agency only publishes and/or quotes news that are favourable to CCP, so they are doing exactly what brain-washing machines do.

-Lik

soli

六四點解會叫六四﹐係用黎屈中共屠殺廣場學生。
如果係講咩木犀地軍民衝突﹐應該叫做六三事件。

rockypath

I'm saying, Xinhua "news" agency only publishes and/or quotes news that are favourable to CCP, so t ...
Lik 發表於 2011-7-12 14:05

Do you have the gut to answer my question directly?

Can it possibly be true that there is NO gun fire and NO student got killed WITHIN Tiananmen Square that night?

Don't BS anything else, just answer me - YES or NO.

I will wait for you coward.

mcjohnjohn

想起一首歌



真也許會害怕　假也許更好吧
真與假有何用　應該睇化
真真　假假　只要相信它