rockypath

同政府打官司？知唔知律師，仲要係大律師幾貴？唔係一般升斗市民可以負擔。 ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-9-13 23:56

一些政治團體之前一直在攻擊政府說政府做事沒有法律支持。他們當中不少是律師或律師團體。 他們若真的是為民請命而不是在做秀抽水，那他們就應該替老百姓出頭，不是只說不做。

soli

喊包周圍話人地“禁錮”他﹐但又怕輸唔敢訴諸法律﹐擺明係身有屎﹐就好似上次那個雞蛋仔呀伯一樣。
唔知被人屈“禁錮”個幾位警員可唔可以告喊包誹謗呢?

fibbi

That is why the western legal system is only for the rich and is not working.
peter236 發表於 2011-9-14 00:07

    咁你話咩制度先至work？大陸嗰套？

fibbi

but that is not fair to just blame the cops duty without any obvious evidence that the justice system recognize
chunsh 發表於 2011-9-14 00:24

    It's also not fair to assume the students misbehaved, either.
To me, the guy who wear the June 4th T-shirt got "removed" right away from the scene. That's more unacceptable.

chunsh

It's also not fair to assume the students misbehaved, either.
To me, the guy who wear the Ju ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-9-14 17:09

the T-Shirt guy is different issue. I tends to believe the cops have received some 線報 and know about the background of that T-Shirt guy so they just block take action to him. What I mean is, he is not just a simple citizen that just wear that T-shirt to walk by. He should have other planning and the cops knew about it. This is my point of view, no matter you agree with it or not, BUT---------


for the hk-U event, if the cop set up some security area, no matter in whcih country in the world, the citizen MUST not cross the line. Now it is the students and those fuxking retarded senators accused the cops are guilty and break the law. No problem, let put it on the court and give evidences and let the judge decide


One important thing, the cops didnt do/say anything pussy to try to accuse the students are guilty in the lawful way. but that 喊包男 and his pussy friends/校長(見風使舵)/政棍do

fibbi

thethe T-Shirt guy is different issue. I tends to believe the cops have received some 線報 and know about the background of that T-Shirt guy so they just block take action to him. What I mean is, he is not just a simple citizen that just wear that T-shirt to walk by. He should have other planning and the cops knew about it. This is my point of view, no matter you agree with it or not, BUT---------
chunsh 發表於 2011-9-14 20:10

你這樣陰謀論，反正我就不信了。

for the hk-U event, if the cop set up some security area, no matter in whcih country in the world, the citizen MUST not cross the line. Now it is the students and those fuxking retarded senators accused the cops are guilty and break the law. No problem, let put it on the court and give evidences and let the judge decide

chunsh 發表於 2011-9-14 20:10

Issue is, if there is a security zone, it should SHOW to public  (e.g. 架起鐵馬) so no one will attempt to get across that boundary. If someone attempt to cross then it's that person's fault. In this case, there is no sign of such security zone.

chunsh

你這樣陰謀論，反正我就不信了。



Issue is, if there is a security zone, it should SHOW to public   ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-9-15 00:33

You just show people another example that we should put that in court
cos you are blaming the cops has done things wrong and not follow the rules.
I was not there and I didnt say the cop have NOT done anything wrong. Thats why I suggest whoever accuse the other party to be guilty should use evidence in court

saying the others guilty and this and that not good without evidence just shows that they are lack of evidence to prove their point and acting sissy

did the cop sue anyone for that or blame anyone have broken the law?

MoiRhapsody

在本港法例下，只可設定公眾範圍或禁區，而在設立之前，都必須刊憲，或者得到行政長官批准。並需要公開宣佈。「核心保安區」係禿鷹老作出黎既字，法律跟本冇俾警隊設立呢樣野既權利。

MoiRhapsody

對，等開完第三次會睇下個民主黨個o靚仔告唔告。

fibbi

回復 17# chunsh

The cop does not sue anyone doesn't mean they have done the right thing. By stopping the students from getting into so-call invisible security zone, to me that doesn't sound right.