大C姐

"第一個打係最著數"..  I doubt that.
B2L2 發表於 2012-10-3 11:21

    事實勝於雄辯。

就呢個case如果事主先打俾ICBC，對方都未必會得程。當然，唔係話打咗電話就一定嬴，但係一定冇壞囉，that's why我話有著數！

B2L2

what's the logic?

When you call in to ICBC, the operator is only there to record down your initial statement.  The operator is not your adjuster and he is not in the position to make any decision.  The operator doesn't care what the statement said.  The adjuster "probably" only open the case after everyone reported.  When you go see the adjuster, you will need to do another detail statement.  The adjuster will be typing in front of you and then ask you to sign that one instead.  Does the adjuster care about who call first?  I really don't think so.

yuusaku

My friend encountered exactly same thing...somehow their "witnesses" come out of nowhere..., in an accident of almost no traffic near by..

My brother's friend once had exactly the same thing.  He got hit in an intersection by an Indian.  The other party brought up a witness and said the opposite story.  He end up 100% at fault.
B2L2 發表於 2012-10-3 12:44

yuusaku

i think it is time to invest at in dash camera...cases like this is getting more common....

B2L2

I heard the Indian has many free floating friends around when they involve in an accident.  Other than my brother's friend case, I heard 3 others all related to Indian.  Just be careful.

loma136

回復 15# B2L2


    我都聽過印度人好齊心，一呼百應！

peter236

    我都聽過印度人好齊心，一呼百應！
loma136 發表於 2012-10-3 19:50

我們也要團結呀.

Look4chrisng

Vancouver is becoming a city of meanies.

yuusaku

齊心都要合法咁用，如果唔係就叫做共犯

回復  B2L2


    我都聽過印度人好齊心，一呼百應！
loma136 發表於 2012-10-3 19:50

KittyLeung74

我們也要團結呀.
peter236 發表於 2012-10-3 23:53

依家就係嗰 Asian girl 同所謂 "witness" 好齊心,講一個非事實的版本,唉 !